On 15/02/12 17:59, Hugo Mills wrote:
It's a temporary location (6 months and counting) while
kernel.org is static-pages-only.
Hugo.
Couldn't btrfs.wiki.kernel.org be made a CNAME for btrfs.ipv5.de for the
time being until kernel.org is up and running?
Or alternatively all requests
Am Montag, 13. Februar 2012 schrieb Marc MERLIN:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:54AM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
On 02/12/2012 11:32 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Actually I had one more question.
I read this page:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-July/msg00042.html
I'm not super
Sorry, I forget to keep Cc´s, different lists, different habits.
To Milan Broz: Well now I noticed that you linked to your own blog entry.
Please do not take my below statements personally - I might have written
them a bit harshly. Actually I do not really know whether your statement
that TRIM
Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
[…]
Am Montag, 13. Februar 2012 schrieb Marc MERLIN:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:54AM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
On 02/12/2012 11:32 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Actually I had one more question.
I read this page:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
To Milan Broz: Well now I noticed that you linked to your own blog entry.
He did not, I'm the one who did.
I asked a bunch of questions since the online docs didn't address them for
me. Some of you answered those for me, I
Hi,
-o discard is supported, but can have some negative consequences on
performance on some SSDs or at least whether it adds worthwhile performance
is up for debate
The problem is, that TRIM can't be benchmarked in a traditional way -
by running one run with TRIM and another one without
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 16:14 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Considering that I have a fairly new crucial 256GB SDD, I'm going to assume
that this bit applies to me:
On the other side, TRIM is usually overrated. Drive itself should keep good
performance even without TRIM, either by using internal
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:42:43AM -0500, Calvin Walton wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 16:14 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Considering that I have a fairly new crucial 256GB SDD, I'm going to assume
that this bit applies to me:
On the other side, TRIM is usually overrated. Drive itself should
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:55:40AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/articles/g/o/t/Gotchas.html
still states 'btrfs volumes on top of dm-crypt block devices (and possibly
LVM) require write-caching to be turned off on the underlying HDD. Failing
to do so, in the event of
On Monday 13 February 2012 11:14:00 Marc MERLIN wrote:
I knew that it created some security problems but I had not yet
found the page you just gave, which effectively states that TRIM
isn't actually that big a win on recent SSDs (I thought it was
actually pretty important to use it on them
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:27:22AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 07:42:41AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:23:45PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:56:24PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Second, I was wondering if anyone is
On 02/12/2012 11:32 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Actually I had one more question.
I read this page:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-July/msg00042.html
I'm not super clear if with 3.2.5 kernel, I need to pass the special
allow_discards option for brtfs and dm-crypt to be safe together,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47:54AM +0100, Milan Broz wrote:
On 02/12/2012 11:32 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Actually I had one more question.
I read this page:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-July/msg00042.html
I'm not super clear if with 3.2.5 kernel, I need to pass the special
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:37:54PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Howdy,
I'm considering using brtfs for my new laptop install.
Encryption is however a requirement, and ecryptfs doesn't quite cut it for
me, so that leaves me with dmcrypt which is what I've been using with
ext3/ext4 for years.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:56:24PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Second, I was wondering if anyone is running btrfs over dmcrypt on an SSD
and what the performance is like with write cache turned off (I'm actually
not too sure what the impact is for SSDs considering that writing to flash
can
Howdy,
I'm considering using brtfs for my new laptop install.
Encryption is however a requirement, and ecryptfs doesn't quite cut it for
me, so that leaves me with dmcrypt which is what I've been using with
ext3/ext4 for years.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/articles/g/o/t/Gotchas.html
still
16 matches
Mail list logo
