On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:52:37AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:55:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello David Sterba,
> >
> > The patch 8eb934591f8b: "btrfs: check unsupported filters in balance
> > arguments" from Oct 12
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:55:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello David Sterba,
>
> The patch 8eb934591f8b: "btrfs: check unsupported filters in balance
> arguments" from Oct 12, 2015, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
>
> fs/btrfs/i
Hello David Sterba,
The patch 8eb934591f8b: "btrfs: check unsupported filters in balance
arguments" from Oct 12, 2015, leads to the following static checker
warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4673 btrfs_ioctl_balance()
warn: possible memory leak of 'bctl'
fs/
We don't verify that all the balance filter arguments supplemented by
the flags are actually known to the kernel. Thus we let it silently pass
and do nothing.
At the moment this means only the 'limit' filter, but we're going to add
a few more soon so it's better to have that fixed. Also in older s
