On 2017年09月21日 10:49, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
On 2017/09/20 23:21, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年09月20日 22:03, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:22:54AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The costly part will be tracking the filesystems of subvolumes.
We must do it for each subvolume and
On 2017/09/20 23:21, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年09月20日 22:03, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:22:54AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> The costly part will be tracking the filesystems of subvolumes.
>>> We must do it for each subvolume and batch them to address the final
>>>
On 2017年09月20日 22:03, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:22:54AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
The costly part will be tracking the filesystems of subvolumes.
We must do it for each subvolume and batch them to address the final
transaction commit for each fs.
I didn't see any easy
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:22:54AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> The costly part will be tracking the filesystems of subvolumes.
> We must do it for each subvolume and batch them to address the final
> transaction commit for each fs.
>
> I didn't see any easy ioctl to get the UUID from fd, meaning
On 2017年09月19日 22:48, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:50:04PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
I read the code of "subvolume delete" and found that --commit-after option is
not working well.
Since it issues BTRFS_IOC_START/WAIT_SYNC to the last fd (of directory
containing the
On 2017/09/19 23:48, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:50:04PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
>> I read the code of "subvolume delete" and found that --commit-after option is
>> not working well.
>>
>> Since it issues BTRFS_IOC_START/WAIT_SYNC to the last fd (of directory
>>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 04:50:04PM +0900, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
> I read the code of "subvolume delete" and found that --commit-after option is
> not working well.
>
> Since it issues BTRFS_IOC_START/WAIT_SYNC to the last fd (of directory
> containing the last deleted subvolume),
> 1. sync
On 2017年09月19日 15:50, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
Hello,
I read the code of "subvolume delete" and found that --commit-after option is
not working well.
Since it issues BTRFS_IOC_START/WAIT_SYNC to the last fd (of directory
containing the last deleted subvolume),
1. sync operation affects only
Hello,
I read the code of "subvolume delete" and found that --commit-after option is
not working well.
Since it issues BTRFS_IOC_START/WAIT_SYNC to the last fd (of directory
containing the last deleted subvolume),
1. sync operation affects only the last fd's filesystem.
("subvolume delete"
