On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
Thanks for your help on this Nick, I've got my current fixes for fsx in
th
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Which cases do set_page_dirty happen without page_mkwrite? For fsx-linux
> > > I hope there shouldn't be
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Which cases do set_page_dirty happen without page_mkwrite? For fsx-linux
> > I hope there shouldn't be any...
>
> I've been assuming its the zap_pte_range part, but now I
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:34:35PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:49AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > > in
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:49AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
>
> This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion p
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:07:21PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > I'll take a look at this later today and see what I can come up with.
> > > Thanks
> > > for reporting
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > > in
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > > in
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
> >
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
> inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
>
> This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion p
Hi Chris,
Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous
inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree.
This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion patch
unfortunately, though it does seem pretty stable so I will probably
13 matches
Mail list logo
