On 9/11/2017 1:35 PM, Duncan wrote:
Rich Rauenzahn posted on Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:45:50 -0700 as excerpted:
...and can it be related to the Samsung 840 SSD's not supporting NCQ
Trim? (Although I can't tell which device this trace is from -- it
could be a mechanical Western Digital.)
On Sun,
Rich Rauenzahn posted on Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:45:50 -0700 as excerpted:
> ...and can it be related to the Samsung 840 SSD's not supporting NCQ
> Trim? (Although I can't tell which device this trace is from -- it
> could be a mechanical Western Digital.)
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Rich
...and can it be related to the Samsung 840 SSD's not supporting NCQ
Trim? (Although I can't tell which device this trace is from -- it
could be a mechanical Western Digital.)
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
> Is this something to be concerned about?
Is this something to be concerned about?
I'm running the latest mainline kernel on CentOS 7.
[ 1338.882288] [ cut here ]
[ 1338.883058] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 790 at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:1559
btrfs_update_device+0x1c5/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[ 1338.883809] Modules linked in: xt_nat veth