-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 10:40, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-30 08:47:38 +0800, Li Zefan:
Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas: [...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
2011-06-30 11:18:42 +0200, Andreas Philipp:
[...]
After that, I posted a patch to fix btrfs-progs, which Chris
aggreed on:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=129238454714319w=2
[...]
Great. Thanks a lot
It fixes my problem indeed.
Which brings me to my next question: where to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 12:43, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-30 11:18:42 +0200, Andreas Philipp: [...]
After that, I posted a patch to fix btrfs-progs, which Chris
aggreed on:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=129238454714319w=2
[...]
Great. Thanks
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:52:59PM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.06.2011 12:43, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-30 11:18:42 +0200, Andreas Philipp: [...]
After that, I posted a patch to fix btrfs-progs, which Chris
aggreed on:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:43:40AM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-30 11:18:42 +0200, Andreas Philipp:
[...]
After that, I posted a patch to fix btrfs-progs, which Chris
aggreed on:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=129238454714319w=2
[...]
Great. Thanks a lot
Hugo Mills keeps an integration branch with nearly all patches to
btrfs-progs applied.
See
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg10594.html
and for the last update
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg10890.html
[...]
Thanks.
It might be worth adding a link to that to
Hiya,
I've got a btrfs FS with 84 subvolumes in it (some created
with btrfs sub create, some with btrfs sub snap of the other
ones). There's no nesting of subvolumes at all (all direct
children of the root subvolume).
The btrfs subvolume list is only showing 80 subvolumes. The 4
missing ones (1
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas:
[...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
which looks like the same issue, with Li Zefan saying he had a
fix, but I couldn't find any mention that it was actually fixed.
Has anybody got any update on
On 06/29/2011 11:00 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas:
[...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
which looks like the same issue, with Li Zefan saying he had a
fix, but I couldn't find any mention that it was
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:16:06PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 06/29/2011 11:00 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas:
[...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
which looks like the same issue, with Li
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
(*) The limited cases where both behaviours return the same set of
keys are:
(i_0, 0, 0) to (i_1, -1UL, -1UL)
I clearly meant (i_1, 255, -1UL) here...
(i, t_0, 0) to (i, t_1, -1UL)
(i, t, o_0) to (i, t, o_1)
--
=== Hugo Mills:
Hi Hugo
On 06/29/2011 06:47 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:16:06PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 06/29/2011 11:00 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas:
[...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
Stephane Chazelas wrote:
2011-06-29 15:37:47 +0100, Stephane Chazelas:
[...]
I found
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/8123/focus=8208
which looks like the same issue, with Li Zefan saying he had a
fix, but I couldn't find any mention that it was actually fixed.
Has
13 matches
Mail list logo
