On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:27:33AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 11:01:46AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
If you're comparing w/ext3 and wondering why btrfs is sooo much
slower it might be because
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 05:55:45PM +0900, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:27:33AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 11:01:46AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
If you're comparing w/ext3 and
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
If you're comparing w/ext3 and wondering why btrfs is sooo much
slower it might be because btrfs has barriers on by default and ext3
doesn't. You could mount -o nobarrier for btrfs or mount -o barrier=1
for ext3 for a
On Wed, Sep 30 2009, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
I wouldn't expect barriers to work here (reminder, this is PATA drive
on ICH7 sata controller), but I will test tomorrow with nobarrier.
Then I probably check his yum upgrade under seekwatcher on friday.
Barriers should work fine on that setup. In
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using btrfs as rootfs on my Fedora 12 (rawhide) test system.
Every yum activity is very slow, like 15 minutes for installation of 11
packages 25MB in
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:18:22AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using btrfs as rootfs on my Fedora 12 (rawhide) test system.
Every yum activity is
Hi,
I'm using btrfs as rootfs on my Fedora 12 (rawhide) test system.
Every yum activity is very slow, like 15 minutes for installation of 11
packages 25MB in size. Kernel is 2.6.31.1-48.fc12.x86_64,
btrfs-progs-0.19-7.fc12.x86_64.
Hardware is pentium 4 3.0 GHz (Hyperthreading, 64 bit), with
