Re: [patch 0/2] grub-0.97: btrfs support

Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 00:15:46 schrieb Johannes Hirte: Am Freitag 25 September 2009 00:06:23 schrieb Edward Shishkin: Hello everyone. ... The following patches are for Fedora 10(**). The distro-independent package will be put to kernel.org a

Re: [patch 2/2] grub-0.97: btrfs multidevice configuration support

Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Dienstag 03 November 2009 01:59:39 schrieb Edward Shishkin: Johannes Hirte wrote: Why is the btrfs code dealing with network devices at all? Why not? :) I don't see the possiblity to get a btrfs filesystem this way. So as far as I understand

Re: a question about btrfs_writepage

2009/12/11 Hu Ruihuan specter...@gmail.com: Hi all,  I am puzzled about a question, everytime when btrfs_writepage is called, whethe the noeds in every levels of the fs tree will be updated. This is the case as I read in the code, but if this case, whether it will give rise to the low

Idea (laptop support) for Project_ideas

Hi all, I've seen a lot of interesting ideas on your wiki page. http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas I'd like to see one more: combining some features (snapshot, Incremental backups, Hybrid Storage, NFS support ) could lead to a file system for Laptops with disconnected mode

Re: [patch 0/2] grub-0.97: btrfs support

Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 16:27:54 schrieb Edward Shishkin: Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 12:17:29 schrieb Edward Shishkin: Johannes Hirte wrote: Am Freitag 11 Dezember 2009 00:15:46 schrieb Johannes Hirte: Am Freitag 25 September 2009 00:06:23 schrieb Edward

Snapshot mysteries (and an oops)

Hi all- I'm a bit mystified by snapshots. I think that there are some bugs in btrfsctl at least (or maybe its documentation). There's definitely at least one bug in the kernel. Here's some commands I just tried (vanilla 2.6.32, btrfs-progs from git today. test is a brand-new empty btrfs

Re: [PATCH] Subvolume listing feature for ioctl.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:42:14PM +0900, TARUISI Hiroaki wrote: New feature to list up subvolume/snapshots under specified tree of file is introduced to ioctl. Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki taruishi.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 283

[PATCH] Btrfs: add ioctl to set the default mount subvol

This patch needs to go along with my previous patch. This lets us set the default dir item's location to whatever root we want to use as our default mounting subvol. With this we don't have to use mount -o subvol=tree id anymore to mount a different subvol, we can just set the new one and it

[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: add command to set default subvol

This introduces a new btrfsctl option, -m, to allow you to set the default'ly mounted subvolume. You can do btrfsctl -m /your/subvolume and that will make that subvolume the subvolume that is mounted by default, or you can do btrfsctl -m treeid /any/subvolume and this will make the subvolume

Re: (Little) Patch about null dereference with acl and posix.

Am Mittwoch 18 November 2009 22:28:27 schrieb briaeros007: Hello, For some days, i've got oops on my system and i've investigate it a bit. The trouble was with posix_acl_equiv_mode , and for some reason (corrupted metadata ?) btrfs sometimes call it with acl==NULL This function doesn't like

Re: [PATCH] Subvolume listing feature for ioctl.

Thank you for your report. I'm going to reprocude this panic and fix it maybe next week. Regards, taruisi (2009/12/12 5:57), Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 02:42:14PM +0900, TARUISI Hiroaki wrote: New feature to list up subvolume/snapshots under specified tree of file is