On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:00 +0300, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/09/2010 05:56 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleena...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Ben Gamaribgamari.f...@gmail.com writes:
ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard
Has the reason for this been identified? Judging from the nature of metadata
loads, it would seem that it should be substantially easier to implement
fsync() efficiently.
By design a copy on write tree fs would need to flush a whole
tree hierarchy on a sync. btrfs avoids this by using a
Hi,
What is your kernel version?
Btrfs hols device names which construct filesystems and
updating device name(device renaming) is merged just in
last month.
Regards,
taruisi
(2010/04/11 10:49), cwillu wrote:
I've got a btrfs on an sd card, which I'm using as the root fs on a
beagle. That's
