Hi,
I am using btrfs on my /home successfully for a while now.
After a power failure I am no longer able to mount it. I tried to use
btrfsck without any success.
The backup I have is about a month old, is there a way I can salvage my files?.
Full backtrace is at http://pastebin.com/4Re7tVFP
I am
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se
wrote:
strncpy(args.name, source, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX);
args.name[BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX] = '\0';
That's silly. Isn't
On to, 2011-02-10 at 11:37 +, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
There's strlcpy, but it's not in glibc because of possible truncation
errors!
snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
glibc functions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs
Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of 2011-02-09 21:52:20 -0500:
Hey all,
Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding the
release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite numerous
claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I have yet to see
even a
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:17:10 -0500, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of 2011-02-09 21:52:20 -0500:
Is there a timeline for getting btrfsck into some sort of usable form?
Yes, but its still real soon now. I've been at about 90% done since
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote:
On to, 2011-02-10 at 11:37 +, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
There's strlcpy, but it's not in glibc because of possible truncation
errors!
snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
glibc functions.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:15:11AM +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
/*
* CC'd to linux-kernel in case they have any feedback on this.
*
* Long thread, trying to work out why mkfs.btrfs failed to
* make a filesystem on an encrypted loopback mount called
* /dev/loop2. Cause turned out to be
On 2011-02-10 13:27, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote:
snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
glibc functions.
But snprintf is not like strlcpy.
It is indeed uglier to write 'snprintf(dst, size, %s,
I'm far from an expert here, but perhaps you would be worth trying a
newer version of the BTRFS drivers, either via a newer kernel or
re-compiling a kernel with updated BTRFS patches.
I would think that the simplest quick test to see if this would help
you would be to get a snapshot from
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:29:41PM +1100, Anil Kumar wrote:
Full backtrace is at http://pastebin.com/4Re7tVFP
Pastebins aren't archived. For posterity, here it is:
Feb 10 21:57:36 linux-wuce kernel: [ 337.522818] Btrfs loaded
Feb 10 21:57:36 linux-wuce kernel: [ 337.538044] device fsid
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:39 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se
wrote:
strncpy(args.name, source,
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 15:54:55 Eduardo Silva wrote:
Hi,
This patch add a new macro called btrfs_error(...) which deprecate the
use of fprintf(stderr, ...)
regards,
Eduardo
Sorry, but I don't see a reason for such change. IMHO it only makes the code
_less_ readable.
Regards,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Of course C++ strings would be much better... :-)
Yeah, why isn't C++ being used?
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Hi,
I'm hitting this issue - sda5 is a normal
Goffredo Baroncelli, Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:57 +0100:
On 02/09/2011 09:12 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:25:34 +0100:
On 02/08/2011 10:26 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:00:25 +0100:
On 02/08/2011 07:57 AM, Lubos Kolouch
On 02/10/2011 02:29 PM, Eduardo Silva wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:39 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jeremy Sanders
jer...@jeremysanders.net wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se
wrote:
Hi,
Could you paste the output of sysrq+t here? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Hirte [mailto:johannes.hi...@fem.tu-ilmenau.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:35 AM
To: Zhong, Xin
Cc: Maria Wikström; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]Btrfs: pwrite
17 matches
Mail list logo
