On 01/06/11 13:07, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 01/06/11 11:54, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:03:12AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Hi
I seem to be able to get btrfs reproducibly to
produce warnings and finally hang when running
a stress test on a ramdisk.
Testing was done using
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I've been playing around with resurrecting the basic sysfs
capabilities that had been previously incorporated into btrfs.
As it stands right now, it was relatively easy to re-implement sysfs
as it was originally. However, that
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:10:49PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I've been playing around with resurrecting the basic sysfs
capabilities that had been previously incorporated into btrfs.
As it stands right now, it was relatively
CC: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
this patch is in conflict with josef's patch
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work.git;a=commit;h=98cdd9ffc5da7aa4c516347f7fc8f65cb08df6ae
fs/btrfs/ctree.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:10:49PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:16:48AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I've been playing around with resurrecting the basic sysfs
capabilities that had been previously incorporated into btrfs.
As it stands right now, it was relatively
On 06/03/2011 08:09 AM, David Sterba wrote:
CC: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
Lets use this instead, I'll drop mine. Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
From: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1598:6: warning: 'ret' may be used
uninitialized in this function
Excerpts from David Sterba's message of 2011-06-03 10:50:14 -0400:
From: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
With Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powercp ppc64_defconfig)
produced this warning:
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c: In function 'btrfs_delayed_update_inode':
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
If no one is already working on it, I'd like to take the Quota lock and
see how far I come.
Let me sketch out in short what I'm planning to do:
- Quota will be subvolume based. Only the FS-trees and data extents
will be
btrfs overwrites memory for too long device paramater
try
btrfs device scan $(awk 'BEGIN{$5090=OFS=x;print}')
...
** buffer overflow detected ***: btrfs terminated
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x37)[0x7f0ef2ea0607]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf6580)[0x7f0ef2e9e580]
btrfs_scan_one_device() directly uses vol-name
without additional checks so in the case of unterminated
string in ioctl it can access memory outside
of btrfs_ioctl_vol_args struct.
Always terminate name string (as the same as other users
do already).
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz mb...@redhat.com
Hello,
I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
[ 9792.654889] [ cut here ]
[ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681
btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]()
[ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
[ 9792.654900] Modules
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
If no one is already working on it, I'd like to take the Quota lock and
see how far I come.
Let me sketch out in short what I'm planning to do:
- Quota
On Friday 03 June 2011 18:24:41 Arne Jansen wrote:
Hi,
If no one is already working on it, I'd like to take the Quota lock and
see how far I come.
Let me sketch out in short what I'm planning to do:
- Quota will be subvolume based. Only the FS-trees and data extents
will be
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:41:08AM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:31:16PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Over the last few weeks, I've been playing with a foolish idea,
mostly triggered by a
Hi,
I'm using SL 6 (RHEL 6) and I've been playing around with running
PostgreSQL on btrfs. Snapshotting works ok, but the computer keeps
rebooting without warning (can be 5 mins or 1.5 hours), finally I
actually managed to get a Kernel Crash instead of just a reboot.
I took a picture of the
16 matches
Mail list logo