On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:34:13PM +0100, Tom Van Braeckel wrote:
The private_data member of the Btrfs control device file
(/dev/btrfs-control) is used to hold the current transaction and needs
to be initialized to NULL to signify that no transaction is in progress.
We explicitly set the
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:46:15PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
The btrfs inode.c relies on implicit inclusion of linux/uio.h for
definitions of struct iov_iter and iov_iter_alignment() which breaks the
current ARM allmodconfig build where that implicit inclusion does not
happen. Add an explicit
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com wrote:
Do you have this fix ..
[PATCH] Btrfs: release path before starting transaction in can_nocow_extent
could you try ?.
I believe I already have this patch. 3.18.9 contains this:
commit
On 24/03/15 17:34, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Sophie Dexter just4pleis...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20/03/2015 15:19, Sophie Dexter wrote:
I'm given to understand that this is the right place to report a btrfs
problem, I apologise if not :-(
I have been using my router as
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:25:30 +
Kline, Matthew matthew.kl...@flukenetworks.com wrote:
Sorry to necrobump this, but the issue came up again.
I'm now on Linux 3.19.2 with btrfs-progs 3.19, and I converted my work laptop
from ext4 to btrfs. Same issue - the conversion goes well,
removing the
Post your btrfs fi df for the filesystem.
In my experience it looks like the conversion may designate large portions of
data as metadata for whatever reason.
A way to clean this up is to run
btrfs fi balance start -musage=5 -dusage=5 /path
try repeating this again and again increasing
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:09:47 +
Kline, Matthew matthew.kl...@flukenetworks.com wrote:
Data, single: total=44.00GiB, used=43.37GiB
System, single: total=32.00MiB, used=12.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=2.00GiB, used=876.84MiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=296.00MiB, used=0.00B
Total
btrfs has started emitting new information from
cmd_subvol_delete(), so filter that out or it breaks btrfs/001:
-Delete subvolume 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
+Delete subvolume (no-commit): 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
(Spell transaction correctly while we're at it.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen
Sorry to necrobump this, but the issue came up again.
I'm now on Linux 3.19.2 with btrfs-progs 3.19, and I converted my work laptop
from ext4 to btrfs. Same issue - the conversion goes well,
removing the ext* subvolume is fine, defragging is works,
and then when I balance, it claims there is no
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:09:47PM +, Kline, Matthew wrote:
Post your btrfs fi df for the filesystem.
In my experience it looks like the conversion may designate large portions
of data as metadata for whatever reason.
A way to clean this up is to run
btrfs fi balance start
The btrfs cmd now sometimes emits btrfs-progs not Btrfs-progs
as it used to, so update the filter accordingly.
(This fixes a failure on btrfs/006 w/ btrfs-progs v3.19)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
---
diff --git a/common/filter.btrfs b/common/filter.btrfs
index
fiemap_fill_next_extent returns 0 on success, -errno on error, 1 if this was
the last extent that will fit in user array. If 1 is returned, the return
value may eventually returned to user space, which should not happen, according
to manpage of ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Chengyu Song
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:12:56PM -0400, Chengyu Song wrote:
fiemap_fill_next_extent returns 0 on success, -errno on error, 1 if this was
the last extent that will fit in user array. If 1 is returned, the return
value may eventually returned to user space, which should not happen,
according
On Fri, Mar 20 2015 at 10:50am -0400,
Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com wrote:
This creates a new target that is meant for file system developers to test
file
system integrity at particular points in the life of a file system. We
capture
all write requests and the data and log the requests and
The private_data member of the Btrfs control device file
(/dev/btrfs-control) is used to hold the current transaction and needs
to be initialized to NULL to signify that no transaction is in progress.
We explicitly set the control file's private_data to NULL to be
independent of whatever value
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:59:01PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
Filling a dm/lvm snapshot triggered this btrfs WARNING, kernel is 4.0-rc3+
It's an EIO because the underlying storage does not want to write the
data.
The same script can trigger warning on ext4 too, I'll file another bug
report to
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:16:47PM +0100, Petr Bena wrote:
I am just wondering, does that defragment trick work for non-root users?
Defragmentation works where read and write would work for the user. Root
can also defrag files that do not have the wite rwx bit set, but it's a
special case
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:55:41PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
AC_ARG_ENABLE(convert) sets $enable_convert, not $enable_btrfsconvert.
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
btrfs has started emitting new information from
cmd_subvol_delete(), so filter that out or it breaks btrfs/001:
-Delete subvolume 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
+Delete subvolume (no-commit): 'SCRATCH_MNT/snap'
(Spell transaction
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:38:20PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
The btrfs cmd now sometimes emits btrfs-progs not Btrfs-progs
as it used to, so update the filter accordingly.
(This fixes a failure on btrfs/006 w/ btrfs-progs v3.19)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
Looks good
Thanks, I'll investigate it soon.
Thanks,
Qu
On 1/2/15 1:12 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Record every file extent discontinuous hole in inode_record using a
rb_tree member.
Before the patch, btrfsck will only record the first file extent hole by
using first_extent_gap, that's good for detecting
AC_ARG_ENABLE(convert) sets $enable_convert, not $enable_btrfsconvert.
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org
---
configure.ac | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 0692d5a..1171ed7 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:10:46PM +, Martin wrote:
As titled:
Does btrfs have dedup (on raid1 multiple disks) that can be enabled?
The current state of play is on the wiki:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Petr Bena wrote:
I would be certainly useful if this kind of tricks were mentioned on
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Compression or anywhere on
wiki
There's a gap between developers (who don't want to write documentation
because they know how
On 1/2/15 1:12 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Record every file extent discontinuous hole in inode_record using a
rb_tree member.
Before the patch, btrfsck will only record the first file extent hole by
using first_extent_gap, that's good for detecting error, but not
suitable for fixing it.
This
I've been having ongoing issues with balance failing with no space errors in
spite of having plenty. Strangely it seems to most often happen from cron jobs,
when a cron job fails I can count on a manual balance succeeding.
I'm running the latest Debian/Jessie kernel.
--
Sent from my Samsung
It seems like it may not be a kernel bug. I've been able to reproduce,
and not reproduce it, with kernel 3.18.9, varying in some other factor
(Fedora 21, vs Fedora 20 live installs).
The short version,
With these, the problem does not reproduce:
libvirt-* 1.1.3.9
qemu-* 1.6.1
With these, the
Debian/Wheezy userspace can't be expected to work as well as desired with a
3.19 kernel.
Wheezy with BTRFS single or RAID1-1 works reasonably well as long as you have
lots of free space, balance it regularly, and configure it not to resume a
balance on reboot.
Debian/Jessie works well with
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Sophie Dexter
just4pleis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/03/2015 15:19, Sophie Dexter wrote:
I'm given to understand that this is the right place to report a
btrfs
problem, I apologise if not :-(
I have been using my router as a simple NFS NAS for around 2 years
On 20/03/2015 15:19, Sophie Dexter wrote:
I'm given to understand that this is the right place to report a btrfs
problem, I apologise if not :-(
I have been using my router as a simple NFS NAS for around 2 years
with an ext3 formatted 2 TB Western Digital 2.5 USB Passport disk. I
have been
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:01:41PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I can't tell if this is a kvm virtio blk device regression, with
cache=none and cache=directsync, or if it's a Btrfs regression.
The summary is that on a host using
Do you have this fix ..
[PATCH] Btrfs: release path before starting transaction in
can_nocow_extent
could you try ?.
Thanks, Anand
On 03/24/2015 12:37 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Rich Freeman
r-bt...@thefreemanclan.net wrote:
I'm having a similar
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
Documentation/btrfs-convert.txt | 21 +++--
btrfs-convert.c | 27 ++-
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-convert.txt
Hi all and maintainers.
I'm investigating several qgroup bugs, and find out current delayed ref
implement has several possible problem which may lead to qgroup bugs.
Although my previous RFC patchset
(http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg42458.html)
is trying to
34 matches
Mail list logo
