Re: QA suite plans

2008-07-18 Thread Ahmed Kamal
Thanks man, I got myself a wiki account, and get btrfs up and running in a VM. Will start planning for the test suite On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Miguel Sousa Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Ahmed Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, cool. If the

[PATCH 1/5] updated acl support patch

2008-07-18 Thread Josef Bacik
Hello, This is an updated ACL patch that applies cleanly to the new stuff in the unstable tree. Thanks, Josef diff -r e7b93e86f40b acl.c --- a/acl.c Fri Jul 18 12:01:11 2008 -0400 +++ b/acl.c Fri Jul 18 19:34:01 2008 -0400 @@ -20,76 +20,302 @@ #include linux/string.h #include

[PATCH 4/5] updated remove useless xattr code

2008-07-18 Thread Josef Bacik
Hello, I don't think this patch changed, but I already said patch blah/5, so I have to include this or it will screw up my numbering :). Thanks, Josef diff -r 870370c6975e ctree.h --- a/ctree.h Wed Jul 09 22:38:43 2008 -0400 +++ b/ctree.h Thu Jul 10 17:35:44 2008 -0400 @@ -1663,8 +1663,7

Re: QA suite plans

2008-07-18 Thread Tim Gelter
Ahmed Kamal wrote: Thanks man, I got myself a wiki account, and get btrfs up and running in a VM. Will start planning for the test suite On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Miguel Sousa Filipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Ahmed Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

2008-07-18 Thread Ahmed Kamal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

2008-07-18 Thread Linda Knippers
Ahmed Kamal wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? I think not so much of a bug

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix nodatacow check

2008-07-18 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:13 +0800, Yan Zheng wrote: Hello, This patch fixes the nodatacow check. The new test function can always detect extents referenced by multiple snatshots. If a extent was allocated in recent two transactions and no snapshot happened in these two transactions, we can

Re: New data=ordered code pushed out to btrfs-unstable

2008-07-18 Thread Ric Wheeler
Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, It took me much longer to chase down races in my new data=ordered code, but I think I've finally got it, and have pushed it out to the unstable trees. There are no disk format changes included. I need to make minor mods to the resizing and balancing code,

Re: [PATCH 5/5] updated patch for new dir format

2008-07-18 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 12:43 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: Hello, Last one, applies cleanly. You'll want to apply these in order otherwise they won't apply properly. Thanks, I'm getting: rm: cannot remove directory `clients/client44': Directory not empty On dbench 50 with this one. Could