Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week on
ext4. Everything was going great, I decided to kill it after
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the tires, I tried the same test that I ran last week
Chris Mason wrote:
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 18:35 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:09 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Just to kick the
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 00:41 +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
Hi,
There's a problem in btrfs_readdir that tries to lock a root node with one
being held. This happens when NFS calls vfs_readdir function with a nfs
specific filldir function pointer. This filldir function, called with the
lock held
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 01:06 +0530, Balaji Rao wrote:
The idea of the patch seems correct to me, that once we own the
lock, an attempt to take it again should be a nop.
Well, kind of correct. There are potentially race conditions with the
handling of f-readdir_process, but given that we only
