I have sent a set of patches that address bugs like this.
I applied the V2 patchset to kernel-v2.6.32 (actually, I applied them
to btrfs-unstalbe, took a kernel-v2.6.32 and replaced its btrfs with
the patched one in btrfs-unstable), and did the test, then got:
$ sudo btrfs device del
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:11 AM, sniper s3c2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to reproduce the bug reported by Tomas Thiemel
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg04818.html) with loop
device, and caught a bug report.
kernel: v2.6.34-rc5-279-g1600f9d
btrfs_progs:
Fix sparse warnings:
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1078:40: warning: symbol 'node' shadows an earlier
one
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1230:32: warning: symbol 'node' shadows an earlier
one
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
---
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c |4 +---
1 files
I've been looking again at the RAID5/RAID6 support, and updated the tree
at git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git#merged
At the moment, we limit writes to a single disk's worth at a time, which
means we _always_ do the read-calculateparity-write cycle and suffer the
traditional
I accidentally did a mkfs.btrfs on a used btrfs filesystem, which now
shows as empty. Is there any way to get the data back?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
My distro: Archlinux
Kernel: 2.6.34-rc5, 2.6.33.3
I has 522 Gib btrfs partition and. While I was checking out chromium source,
free space on my /home btrfs partition was about 20 Gib. Then I received
message not enough free space (but there was enough of it). And even after
btrfsck I always get
Hi Justin,
I use Gentoo and I had Kernel OOPS, too (with 2.6.33), until I upgraded to the
lastest not stable kernel - 2.6.34-rc5. Now (almost) everything works OK. I
also had to re-format partition because there is one small problem:
When you add disk (in single mode) and then you rebalance
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 07:06:06PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
I've been looking again at the RAID5/RAID6 support, and updated the tree
at git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git#merged
At the moment, we limit writes to a single disk's worth at a time, which
means we _always_
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:26:16AM -0700, Ilya Shestopalov wrote:
My distro: Archlinux
Kernel: 2.6.34-rc5, 2.6.33.3
I has 522 Gib btrfs partition and. While I was checking out chromium source,
free space on my /home btrfs partition was about 20 Gib. Then I received
message not enough free
- David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org skrev:
I've been looking again at the RAID5/RAID6 support, and updated the
tree
at git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git#merged
At the moment, we limit writes to a single disk's worth at a time,
which
means we _always_ do the
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:39 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
It seems to work, and recovery is successful when I mount the file
system with -oro,degraded. But in read-write mode it'll oops (even
without the below patch) because it's trying to _write_ to the degraded
RAID6. Last time I was testing
Bug message:
Btrfs loaded
device fsid 694983118c1865e7-ed2ca7537412e6ae devid 1 transid 73188 /dev/sda5
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:809!
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
last sysfs file:
Bug message:
Btrfs loaded
device fsid 694983118c1865e7-ed2ca7537412e6ae devid 1 transid 73188 /dev/sda5
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:809!
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
last sysfs file:
13 matches
Mail list logo