Re: no space left on device

2010-07-30 Thread Lubos Kolouch
correction - btrfs-cache processes Lubos Kolouch, Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:02:18 +: > With 2.6.34 it basically "works", but time to time the load goes up to > 50 and lot of btrfs-cleaner processess are spawned... the system is > responsive though, except for the filesystem... after an hour or so t

Re: no space left on device

2010-07-30 Thread Lubos Kolouch
With 2.6.34 it basically "works", but time to time the load goes up to 50 and lot of btrfs-cleaner processess are spawned... the system is responsive though, except for the filesystem... after an hour or so the processes finish and the load goes back to normal Lubos > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:

Re: no space left on device

2010-07-30 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos
Sorry for the HTML replies.. I just read the mail delivery failure and turned it to plain text. You can check the quoted text for my answers. On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > I use the latest btrfs-tools and 2.6.34-020634-generic kernel for lucid. > Got no issues lik

Re: no space left on device

2010-07-30 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Yes, I pulled today's btrfs-progs. Lubos On Pá, čec 30, 2010, 13:03:10, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote: > Have you updated with latest btrfs-tools? > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > kerner 2.6.35-rc6 > > > > btrfs filesystem df /home > > Data: total=1.6

Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2

2010-07-30 Thread Adi
hi, i used a current stable gentoo with a 2.6.34-r2 gentoo-kernel. the btrfs filesystem is on a lvm, which is on a luks-partition. i think i corrupted the filesystem with a 2.6.34 tuxonice kernel, witch ran fine without suspend-to-disk, but after suspending i couldn't reboot anymore. this debug