Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-10 Thread Itaru Kitayama
Thank you, Zhu. Would you send the patch to Andrew or should I pass it on to him? Itaru On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:30:52 +0800 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, That's because btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log() will return the real errno after Andi's commit, so btrfs_unlink_inode() has to

Re: 2.6.35.4 fumble-spolision

2010-09-10 Thread Simon Kirby
Sorry, I meant to change that subject. :) On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:49:09PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: What does btrfsck say? Does the problem go away in 2.6.33? Will try 2.6.33 again tomorrow. btrfsck runs for about 44 seconds and then outputs as copied below. Simon- # btrfsck

Re: 2.6.35.4 fumble-spolision

2010-09-10 Thread Yan, Zheng
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Simon Kirby s...@hostway.ca wrote: Sorry, I meant to change that subject. :) On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:49:09PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: What does btrfsck say?  Does the problem go away in 2.6.33? Will try 2.6.33 again tomorrow.  btrfsck runs for about 44

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2642!

2010-09-10 Thread Zhu Yanhai
Please feel free to forward it, as I don't know the addr for -mm tree. -zyh 2010/9/10 Itaru Kitayama kitay...@cl.bb4u.ne.jp: Thank you, Zhu. Would you send the patch to Andrew or should I pass it on to him? Itaru On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:30:52 +0800 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com wrote:

[PATCH] fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c: fixed compiler warnings for using uninitialized variable

2010-09-10 Thread Frank Morales II
From 1c304defc543738f82ccb18fe10b558dd2098d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frank Morales II alt...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:34:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c: fixed compiler warnings for using uninitialized variable In the function tree_search, the variable prev

Re: 2.6.35.4 fumble-spolision

2010-09-10 Thread Simon Kirby
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:21:16PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?tree block key (5643880 60 602) level 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?tree block backref root 853 failed to find block number 1923814297600 Abort How large is the FS ? Is it possible to run btrfs-image and send the output

Re: btrfs on LVM: Out of space

2010-09-10 Thread Marcel Lohmann
2010/9/9 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com: 2010/9/9 Marcel Lohmann marcel.lohm...@googlemail.com: 2010/9/8 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com: Hi, Have you ever tried with 'mkfs.btrfs -m single /dev/'? As you had a RAID1 based on LVM, you don't have to keep the default duplicated metadata

btrfs-debug-image crash

2010-09-10 Thread Simon Kirby
I was running this while the fs was mounted, which is probably not what was expected, but here's a crash report anyway. :) Simon- [/usr/src/btrfs-tools/btrfs-tools-0.19+20100601]# gdb --args ./btrfs-debug-tree /dev/etherd/e14.0 GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation,