extend the
btrfs cmd --help
command to print detailed help message if available but fallback to
basic help message if detailed is unavailable
add detailed help message for 'filesystem defragment' command
little tweaks in comments
Signed-off-by: Hubert Kario ka...@wit.edu.pl
---
Hallo, Martin,
Du meintest am 23.01.11:
I have something I do not have the slightest clue on how to track
down:
Occasionally with 2.6.37 plain vanilla my ThinkPad T23 freezes in
such a way, that when I type a command at the prompt, nothing will
happen anymore. Same goes for login into a
CCs restored. Its usual to keep CCs on Linux kernel related mailing lists.
Am Sunday 23 January 2011 schrieb Helmut Hullen:
Hallo, Martin,
Du meintest am 23.01.11:
I have something I do not have the slightest clue on how to track
down:
Occasionally with 2.6.37 plain vanilla my
Hello Hubert,
please update the man page too.
Regards
G.Baroncelli
On 01/23/2011 01:42 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
extend the
btrfs cmd --help
command to print detailed help message if available but fallback to
basic help message if detailed is unavailable
add detailed help
Hallo, Martin,
Du meintest am 23.01.11:
Maybe it's the same problem ... I have (among my machines) a
Thinkpad T22 on which I have run btrfs with kernel 2.6.37-rc4.
Sometimes it hung, too. But it's an old machine, with old RAM, with
some old disks.
Is the hung comparable to what I have
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:44:34AM -0500, Ian! D. Allen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:15:49AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Ian! D. Allen idal...@idallen.ca wrote:
Still getting btrfsck errors with this:
On Sunday 23 of January 2011 15:07:09 Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hello Hubert,
please update the man page too.
I started to do it but then I noticed that you have made a few changes to the
man page yourself.
I'm quite new to the git/mail patch system of releases and I'm not sure if I
should
Hallo, Goffredo,
Du meintest am 23.01.11:
extend the
btrfs cmd --help
command to print detailed help message if available but fallback to
basic help message if detailed is unavailable
add detailed help message for 'filesystem defragment' command
little tweaks in comments
Hi,
no :)
All those patches need to be applied to the current git. I'm sure there will be
an
e-mail if all those patches are applied.
Regards,
Felix
On 23. January 2011 - 15:26, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Date: 23 Jan 2011 15:26:00 +0100
From: Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de
To:
There are a lot of patches regarding the btrfs-tool.
Unfortunately, the btrfs maintainer are very busy in other areas of the
project. I don't know when (if) these patches will be applied.
However I think that is better have a misaligned patch instead nothing.
Regards
G.Baroncelli
On 01/23/2011
Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:13 +0100:
Hi Lubos,
On 01/23/2011 08:17 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Hello,
During doing backups I found strange behaviour... 2.6.37, latest btrfs-
progs from git
nbgentoo ~ # btrfs subv crea a
Create subvolume './a'
nbgentoo ~ # cd a
On Sunday 23 of January 2011 15:54:12 Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
There are a lot of patches regarding the btrfs-tool.
Unfortunately, the btrfs maintainer are very busy in other areas of the
project. I don't know when (if) these patches will be applied.
However I think that is better have a
Update
btrfs filesystem defragment
command explanation. Add explanation of advanced parameters and notes
about general usage.
Add few notes about the
btrfs command --help
usage, fix related grammar.
Signed-off-by: Hubert Kario ka...@wit.edu.pl
---
man/btrfs.8.in | 33
On 01/23/2011 04:05 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:13 +0100:
Hi Lubos,
On 01/23/2011 08:17 AM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Hello,
Is this a bug or intended behaviour and I am missing something
something? How to snapshot a subvolume, containing another
Hi, Felix,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:56:12PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
It was a simple:
mkfs.btrfs -L backup -d single /dev/loop2
But it also happens without the options, like:
mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop2
/dev/loop2 is a loop device, which is aes encrypted. The output of losetup
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:07:54AM -0800, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On /dev/sda I have sda1 which is my / bootable filesystem for Debian
formatted ext4. This is 256MB on a 2TB drive.
I want to set up the rest of the drive as BTRFS for various functions, and I
presume that I first
Also, btrfs already has a utility to scan for subvolumes in a directory
btrfs subvolume list /path
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli
kreij...@libero.it wrote:
On 01/23/2011 04:05 PM, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli, Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:17:13 +0100:
Hi Lubos,
On
On 01/23/2011 07:18 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Hi, Felix,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:56:12PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
It was a simple:
mkfs.btrfs -L backup -d single /dev/loop2
But it also happens without the options, like:
mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop2
/dev/loop2 is a loop device, which is
Hi Goffredo,
you're damn right :)
scooter ~ # losetup -a
/dev/loop0: [0010]:3154
(/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par)
encryption=AES128
/dev/loop1: [0010]:4552
(/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par)
encryption=AES128
/dev/loop2:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On 01/23/2011 07:18 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
Hi, Felix,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:56:12PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
It was a simple:
mkfs.btrfs -L backup -d single /dev/loop2
But it also happens without the
Hi,
losetup is part of util-linux:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/
I'm using 2.17.2. Don't know if that is some kind of revision.
I tried the newest version 2.19-rc1. There seems to be some kind of fix:
scooter ~ # /home/fame/tmp/util-linux-2.19-rc1/mount/losetup -a
btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction() returns ERR_PTR(), not NULL.
So, it is necessary to use IS_ERR() to check the return value.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh t-i...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -urNp
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:07 AM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On /dev/sda I have sda1 which is my / bootable filesystem for Debian
formatted ext4. This is 256MB on a 2TB drive.
Really? How do you know it's 256 MB?
# fdisk /dev/sda
WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on
23 matches
Mail list logo
