I've just updated the integration branch with additional patches
from Andreas Philipp and the patch from Hubert Kario that I forgot to
include last time.
Available from:
http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20110703
Hugo.
Andreas Philipp (5):
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Stephane Chazelas
wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> I've got a server using brtfs to implement a backup system.
> Basically, every night, for a few machines, I rsync (and other
> methods) their file systems into one btrfs subvolume each and
> then snapshot it.
>
> On that server,
In the file btrfs-list.c version.h was included but not used. So just
drop it.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp
---
btrfs-list.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c
index f804dfc..1495dae 100644
--- a/btrfs-list.c
+++ b/btrfs-list.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please ignore this patch. I found a more elegant solution just right now.
Thanks,
Andreas
On 03.07.2011 20:43, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
>> By adding btrfs-list.o as a seperate target which
Hiya,
I've got a server using brtfs to implement a backup system.
Basically, every night, for a few machines, I rsync (and other
methods) their file systems into one btrfs subvolume each and
then snapshot it.
On that server, the btrfs fs is on 3 3TB drives, mounted with
compress-force. Every week
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:44:38AM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
> Just do a few simple style/layout changes to make the makefile look
> better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp
> ---
> Makefile | 18 --
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Ma
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:44:36AM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
> When issuing 'make clean' not all files generated by the individual
> targets have been deleted since some files have been missing in the
> definition of the 'make clean' target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp
> ---
> Makefil
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
> By adding btrfs-list.o as a seperate target which depends additionally
separate
> on version we can fix the following build error when invoking 'make
> btrfs'.
>
> btrfs-list.c:37:21: error: version.h
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Sunday 03 of July 2011 14:56:40 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
>> > On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoul
On Sunday 03 of July 2011 14:56:40 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 P
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Calvin Walton
> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:08 +0100, Leonidas
On Sunday 03 of July 2011 00:40:46 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Calvin Walton
wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:08 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I just install
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Werner Fischer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> are there any plans that future versions of mkfs.btrfs will do an
> initial pre-discard for SSDs? (AFAIK mkfs.btrfs does not do this
> currently)
It should already have it. That is, if you look in the right place
commit e6bd18d8
Hi all,
are there any plans that future versions of mkfs.btrfs will do an
initial pre-discard for SSDs? (AFAIK mkfs.btrfs does not do this
currently)
For Ext4, mke2fs does this with the -E discard option.
>From the mke2fs manpage:
-E discard
Attempt to discard blocks at mkfs time (discardin
Craig Johnson gmail.com> writes:
>
> I can wait a couple of days for the new tool - glad to know that there
> is still hope. If the new btrfsck isn't available within a week or so
> I might hit you up for that patch. Thanks!
>
> - Craig
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Josef Bacik redha
15 matches
Mail list logo