On 09/07/2011 02:31 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
Is it a bug? or Am I missing something?
You need to run this before mounting the devices:
# btrfs device scan
Thank you, it works by executing device scan.
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body
> 1. Create and format two images, the 1st in 400Mbytes, and 2nd in 286Mbytes.
> root@pibroch:/btrfs-progs# ls -lh /usr/src/linux-3.0/img*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jeff jeff 400M 2011-09-07 12:00 /usr/src/linux-3.0/img0
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jeff jeff 286M 2011-09-07 12:00 /usr/src/linux-3.0/img1
Very small btrfs
Hello,
I was trying to create a multi-device Btrfs filesystem using two
loopback devices, by referring to the following page:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Using_Btrfs_with_Multiple_Devices
However, I met a strange thing while mounting the first loop device
without any extra mount o
David Sterba wrote:
> An attribute is not removed by 'setfattr -x attr file' and remains
> visible in attr list. This makes xfstests/062 pass again.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Li Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a m
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:00:21AM +1000, Dante wrote:
> > > Bad case of user error here but I managed to reformat one half of a
> > > btrfs volume that was set up with metadata raid-1 and data raid-0.
>
> > It won't help you - but did you format it with mkfs.btrfs, while it was
> > mounted?
>
>
> > Bad case of user error here but I managed to reformat one half of a
> > btrfs volume that was set up with metadata raid-1 and data raid-0.
> It won't help you - but did you format it with mkfs.btrfs, while it was
> mounted?
No I formatted as ext4 while off-line.
Thanks for the feedback.
I
When btrfs_orphan_cleanup encounters an inode marked as bad, instead of going
down the code path that handles such inodes, it fails with the following error
message:
btrfs: could not do orphan cleanup -116
This happens as the called btrfs_iget returns an error when encountering such
inode.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> On Monday 5 September 2011 22:25:23 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> I've seen similar problem on Ubuntu-11 + Aspire One (8GB of slow "SSD").
>> More specifically half of ubuntu install went very fast and when
>> disk was ~50% free things sudd
When I check /proc/diskstats on mounted partitions before and after
'sync' on idle system, I can tell from write activity which partitions
are btrfs and which are ext3/ext4/swap.
On idle system after running sync, there is no activity on any
ext3/ext4/swap except root filesystem. But there are wri
Hi all.
I was doing some testing with writing out data to a BTFS filesystem
with the compress-force option. With 1 program running, I saw
btfs-delalloc taking about 1 CPU worth of time, much as could be
expected. I then started up 2 programs at the same time, writing data
to the BTRFS volume. b
On Monday 5 September 2011 22:25:23 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> I've seen similar problem on Ubuntu-11 + Aspire One (8GB of slow "SSD").
> More specifically half of ubuntu install went very fast and when
> disk was ~50% free things suddenly gone slow.
I'm just about to give up and definitely quit
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:32:45PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> I think we don't need to fetch the inode size in advance. :-P.
yes, the value is not used and rewritten a few lines below anyway.
Please send a patch with proper header and signed-off line to be
accepted.
david
>
> diff --git a/f
An attribute is not removed by 'setfattr -x attr file' and remains
visible in attr list. This makes xfstests/062 pass again.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
fs/btrfs/xattr.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/xattr.c b/fs/btrfs/xattr.c
index
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 16:43 +0200, Björn Kalkbrenner wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Am 05.09.2011 15:07, schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> > Well, it's *sort of* expected if you think about it. When you mounted
> > after set-default, your /home is no longer a valid subvolume access
> > point (it was in the default s
Otherwise we can execced the array bound of path->slots[].
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 011cab3..0fe615e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.
15 matches
Mail list logo