On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:08:55AM +0800, WuBo wrote:
> This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small
> files
> into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk
> is
> not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64.
It seems like you really want to
This test is for write-posix test. If writing a file when the disk is almost
full, the posix wants the call to write as much as possible but not none.
quote the POSIX:
If a write() requests that more bytes be written than there is room for
(for example, [XSI] [Option Start] the process' file size
This test is for preallocation test. If the disk is full, just with a prealloc
file has some free space that prealloc early. We need to check whether the write
to the free space is success or not.
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo
---
265 | 107 +++
This test is a stress test. It creates a set of threads for coping small files
into disk. I use a 2G disk for test, the ENOSPC arises usually but the disk is
not full under kenerl 3.0 with intel64.
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo
---
264 | 158
This patch set add a group of reservation space test. Especailly for btrfs.
It includes three parts: copy workload, prealloc and write posix.
For test 264, I hope it's usefull for Josef's reserve improve work.
For test 265 and 266, the current btrfs is not pass yet.
TO avoid fill the huge disk, I
(as this is going to be merged into mainline..)
> +/*
> + * calls iterate() for every inode that references the extent identified by
> + * the given parameters. will use the path given as a parameter and return it
> + * released.
> + * when the iterator function returns a non-zero value, iteration
In integration-scrub branch, following warning messages were displayed by
running xfstests.
# btrfs fi sh /dev/sdd4
Label: none uuid: 8f28d85c-e37c-4c1b-adef-2627ca59be78
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 31.49MB
devid1 size 9.31GB used 9.31GB path /dev/sdd4
devid2 siz
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:02:31AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> This one happened again, exactly same sequence of warnings and the crash
> at the end (same stack traces). It was in integration-scrub branch, ie.
> with all fixes on top.
>
> (I have captured sysrq-w, /proc/pid/stack of all processes
This one happened again, exactly same sequence of warnings and the crash
at the end (same stack traces). It was in integration-scrub branch, ie.
with all fixes on top.
(I have captured sysrq-w, /proc/pid/stack of all processes and have the
dmesg logs if anybody is interested.)
david
--
To unsubs
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:52:28 +
Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> This might interest you.
Thanks
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ilya Dryomov
> Date: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: mention libattr dependency in INSTALL file
> To: linux-btrfs@vg
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:22:41PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> this is the first of 7 patches, which improve the man page of the btrfs
> command.
> I added some basic text fro the man page for the "filesystem restriper *" and
> the "quota/qgroup *" commands. I put in CC the writer hoping
This test checks that the man page cites all the btrfs commands
Comments are welcome.
BR
G.Baroncelli
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
test/003s.sh | 40
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 test/003s.sh
diff --
Add the man page info for the "btrfs subvolume get-default" command. This
command
was not mentioned in the man page before.
Comments are welcome.
BR
G.Baroncelli
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
btrfs_cmds.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
Warn that the man/btrfs.8.in man page is auto-generated
Comments are welcome.
BR
G.Baroncelli
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
btrfs.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c
index 4235d54..d7ece5b 100644
--- a/btrfs.c
+++ b/btrfs.c
Add qgroup/quota btrfs commands info for man page.
Arne,
please could you be so kindly to take care of these info for the man page
from now onwards ? I extract the text both from your pdf and your email. May be
something was wrong because I am not familiar with the qgroup/quota commands.
After
Added "btrfs filesystem restriper *" commands to the man page
Ilya,
could you be so kindly to take care of these info for the man page
from now onwards ?
After merging this patch you can see this text in the man page doing:
make man/btrfs.8.in
man man/btrfs.8.in
Don't hesitate to contact me fo
Removed some static buffer, and replaced by a dynamic memory allocation
in order to support bigger text.
Comments are welcome.
BR
G.Baroncelli
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli
---
helpextract.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/helpextract.c
Hi all,
this is the first of 7 patches, which improve the man page of the btrfs
command.
I added some basic text fro the man page for the "filesystem restriper *" and
the "quota/qgroup *" commands. I put in CC the writer hoping that they will
care to maintain aligned the documentation with the
Hi hugo
On Sunday, 30 October, 2011 21:44:56 Hugo Mills wrote:
> Add a shell-script based test harness for performing regression tests
> on btrfs tools. This is not intended as a test system for kernel
> issues, but instead to put the userspace tools through their paces.
>
> Currently implemented
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 05:14:33PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov
> ---
> INSTALL |3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
> index 6afbd90..11c388b 100644
> --- a/INSTALL
> +++ b/INSTALL
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ insmod
Because of the overcommit stuff I had to make it so that we committed the
transaction all the time in reserve_metadata_bytes in case we had overcommitted
because of delayed items. This was because previously we had no way of knowing
how much space was reserved for delayed items. Now that we have
Hi hugo
On Sunday, 30 October, 2011 21:44:56 Hugo Mills wrote:
> Add a shell-script based test harness for performing regression tests
> on btrfs tools. This is not intended as a test system for kernel
> issues, but instead to put the userspace tools through their paces.
>
> Currently implemented
I've been hitting warnings in use_block_rsv when running the delayed insertion
stuff. It's because we will readjust global block rsv based on what is in use,
which means we could end up discarding reservations that are for the delayed
insertion stuff. So instead create a seperate block rsv for th
Hallo, Arne,
Du meintest am 02.11.11:
>> # btrfs scrub status /srv/MM
>>
>> scrub status for 120b036a-883f-46aa-bd9a-cb6a1897c8d2
>> scrub resumed at Wed Nov 2 17:02:07 2011 and was aborted after
>> 16519 secondstotal bytes scrubbed: 1.79TB with 61 errors
>> error details: read
On 11/02/2011 06:41 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I'd like to get some explanations ...
>
>
> # btrfs filesystem show
>
> Label: 'MMedia' uuid: 120b036a-883f-46aa-bd9a-cb6a1897c8d2
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB
> devid1 size 1.82TB used 1.29TB path /dev/sdg1
>
Hallo,
I'd like to get some explanations ...
# btrfs filesystem show
Label: 'MMedia' uuid: 120b036a-883f-46aa-bd9a-cb6a1897c8d2
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB
devid1 size 1.82TB used 1.29TB path /dev/sdg1
devid3 size 1.81TB used 1.29TB path /dev/sdc1
Hi,
all reported issues are fixed with the updated branch, thanks!
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hallo, Ilya,
Du meintest am 02.11.11:
> The Btrfs utility programs require libuuid to build. This can be
> found in the e2fsprogs sources, and is usually available as libuuid
> or e2fsprogs-devel from various distros. The other dependency is
> libattr +(libattr1-dev in Debian-based distros).
ts ID 262 .
This patch makes mount fail with EINVAL with a message in syslog.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
v2->v3: dropped unused setting of error variable
branch with v3: hotfixes-2002/josef/for-chris in my repo
fs/btrfs/super.c | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 inse
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov
---
INSTALL |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/INSTALL b/INSTALL
index 6afbd90..11c388b 100644
--- a/INSTALL
+++ b/INSTALL
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ insmod btrfs.ko
The Btrfs utility programs require libuuid to build. This can be fou
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git
> However, when I come to make it fails like so:
>
> gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:00:19AM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Does not load. Wondering if this should wo
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > xfstests/083 and 089 cause the following warnings. I've seen them before
> > when
> > testing josef/for-chris and josef/master branches (reported on irc).
>
> Ok, just a status update on my end. Josef and I have the block group
> w
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:36:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> The bundle uses the devices /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdg1, "btrfs
> filesystem show" shows these informations.
>
> Mounting doesn't work immediately; most times I have to run the "mount"
> command three times - strange.
I o
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:00:19AM +, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> >>
> >> Does not load. Wondering if this should work or has been moved ?
> >
> > It's a victim of the kern
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:07:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>> Does not load. Wondering if this should work or has been moved ?
>
> It's a victim of the kernel.org hack. Nobody seems to have a spare
> copy, but the database on kernel.org s
Andres, can you check with Chris that the btrfs changes made it to
his tree? The core lseek changes from Andi are in mainline now, but
I think these bits are better off going through Chrises btrfs tree.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 10:49:27PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Don't need the i_mutex for
37 matches
Mail list logo
