On 19.01.2012 06:58, Miao Xie wrote:
Onwed, 18 Jan 2012 11:12:20 +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On 17.01.2012 21:58, Chris Mason wrote:
These two didn't make my first pull request just because I wanted to get
something out the door. I'll definitely have them in the next pull.
Please, don't
As you might know, I have been seeing btrfs slowdowns in our ceph
cluster for quite some time. Even with the latest btrfs code for 3.3
I'm still seeing these problems. To make things reproducible, I've now
written a small test, that imitates ceph's behavior:
On a freshly created btrfs filesystem
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
Then again, most fsck feature has been implemented in kernel space so
a mount will automatically fix some types of problems (somewhat
similar to what zfs does, which has no fsck whatsoever). So just watch
syslog for any
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54:55AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The intent here was to do a logical instead of a bitwise . The
original condition tests whether they have the some of same bits set.
I have fixed that and rewritten it to be more clear.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:21:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:24:37PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2375,12 +2375,11 @@ static int should_balance_chunk(struct btrfs_root
*root,
struct
On 01/19/2012 05:24 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With the most current git kernel (90a4c0f51e8e44111a926be6f4c87af3938a79c3)
I'm still getting the same reproducible kernel panic when trying to read a
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
I have a Btrfs partition that is reliably reproducing premature ENOSPC
when restoring the disk from a tar file, but it is only happening with
zlib compression (lzo or no compression proceeds normally).
thank you
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/19/2012 05:24 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Vincent Vanackere
vincent.vanack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With the most current git kernel
