There's a few things that bother me about this, not least of all the
assumptions it makes about cron,(notably the direct modification of
crontab files, which is considered to be an internal detail if I
understand correctly, and I'm fairly certain is broken as written),
and how it writes to its own
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:59:36 +0800
asj anand.j...@oracle.com wrote:
This patch adds btrfs autosnap feature. This creates and
saves the autosnap config at /etc/autosnap/config.
Depending on the configuration, autosnap either schedules
the snapshots by updating the crontab or provides an API
2012/2/29 Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com:
2012/2/29 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
[ btrfs faster than ext for find and cp -a ]
2012/2/29 Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com:
I will try to answer the question from
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:54:06PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann m...@suse.com wrote:
are available in the openSUSE buildservice at:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/mge1512:/snapper/
Hi Matthias,
I'm
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with made my day :)
seekwatcher run of tar cf to eliminate writes (all done on 3.2.7):
1) btrfs: http://dozzie.jarowit.net/~dozzie/luczajac/tar_btrfs.png
2)
2012/3/1 Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with made my day :)
seekwatcher run of tar cf to eliminate writes (all done on 3.2.7):
1) btrfs:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Arvin Schnell aschn...@suse.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:54:06PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann m...@suse.com
wrote:
are available in the openSUSE buildservice at:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
2012/3/1 Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com
wrote:
While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with made my day :)
seekwatcher run of tar cf to
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:58:14PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:41:02AM -0800, bella tk wrote:
I want to use btrfs defrag tool but before that i want to know how
much the disk is fragmented. I have tried to use filefrag but it gives
me FIBMAP:invalid argument for
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:44:31PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
You might try sorting the entries returned by readdir by inode number before
you stat them.This is a long-standing weakness in ext3/ext4, and it has
to do with how we added hashed tree indexes to directories in (a) a backwards
2012/3/1 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
2012/3/1 Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak difrost.ker...@gmail.com
wrote:
While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
2012/3/1 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
XFS will probably beat btrfs in this test. Their directory indexes
reflect on disk layout very well.
True, but not that fast on small files.
Except the question I've raised in
2012/3/1 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
2012/3/1 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
XFS will probably beat btrfs in this test. Their directory indexes
reflect on disk layout very well.
True, but not that fast on small
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
Yep, ext4 is close to my wife's closet.
Were all of the file systems freshly laid down, or was this an aged
ext4 file system?
Also you should beware that if you have a workload which is heavy
parallel I/O, with lots of random,
On 02/28/2012 09:51 AM, dima wrote:
On 02/28/2012 07:10 AM, Chester wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:54 AM, dimadole...@parallels.com wrote:
Hello,
Since several people asked to post the results, here they are.
I tried raw virtio disk with and without -z -C set and also qcow2 virtio
disk
15 matches
Mail list logo