On 05.03.2012 08:07, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>> (notably the direct modification of
>>> crontab files, which is considered to be an internal detail if I
>>> understand correctly, and I'm fairly certain is broken as written),
>>
>>
>> I did c
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>> (notably the direct modification of
>> crontab files, which is considered to be an internal detail if I
>> understand correctly, and I'm fairly certain is broken as written),
>
>
> I did came across that point of view however, using crontab c
(notably the direct modification of
crontab files, which is considered to be an internal detail if I
understand correctly, and I'm fairly certain is broken as written),
I did came across that point of view however, using crontab cli in the
program wasn't convincing either, (library call woul
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui
---
ctree.h |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
index 54748c8..1b17577 100644
--- a/ctree.h
+++ b/ctree.h
@@ -118,10 +118,6 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle;
/* csum types */
#define BTRFS_CSUM_TYPE_CRC32 0
2012/3/3 Jacek Luczak :
> 2012/3/2 Chris Mason :
>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>> 2012/3/2 Chris Mason :
>>> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:05:56AM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I've took both on tests. The subject is acp and spd_readdir used with
>>> >>
