On 04/10/2012 02:24 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:39:14PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I hit this BUG today.
I'm running 3.3.1 merged with the ceph and btrfs bits for 3.4,
i.e. 3.3.1 +
commit bc3f116fec194 "Btrfs: update the checks for mixed block groups with big
metada
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:39:14PM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hit this BUG today.
>
> I'm running 3.3.1 merged with the ceph and btrfs bits for 3.4,
> i.e. 3.3.1 +
> commit bc3f116fec194 "Btrfs: update the checks for mixed block groups with
> big metadata blocks"
> commit c01a9
Hi,
I hit this BUG today.
I'm running 3.3.1 merged with the ceph and btrfs bits for 3.4,
i.e. 3.3.1 +
commit bc3f116fec194 "Btrfs: update the checks for mixed block groups with big
metadata blocks"
commit c01a935b9 "rbd: move snap_rwsem to the device, rename to
header_rwsem"
The btrfs
Hi,
the issue I raised in this thread is still not fixed. Please, could
someone look into it? A fix should be simple, especially as the issue is
easily reproducable. (In case the information in this thread so far is
not sufficient for that I will happily provide a recipe; just ask.)
Also, I believ
Hello,
In an effort to be a little bit better about reviewing patches sent to the
mailinglist I've created a btrfs-next git tree kernel.org. You can get it here
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git
I'm going to be scraping the mailinglist every day for patches that
A user reported that booting his box up with btrfs root on 3.4 was way
slower than on 3.3 because I removed the ideal caching code. It turns out
that we don't load the free space cache if we're in a commit for deadlock
reasons, but since we're reading the cache and it hasn't changed yet we are
saf
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 18:29 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:04:00PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 11:16 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > This one brings the mount time right down on my laptop, it's back to
> > around 0.5 seconds, same as 3.3.x.
>
> Did
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:04:00PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 11:16 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> This one brings the mount time right down on my laptop, it's back to
> around 0.5 seconds, same as 3.3.x.
Did you notice any change during umount?
david
--
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:44:05PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> > Thanks. btrfs-debug-tree confirms that you've got a balance item on
> > media.
>
> > > > > > After that mount it back and see if there is "btrfs: conti
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 11:16 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 05:20:46PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 16:54 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:53 -0400, Calvin Wal
On 10.04.2012 12:07, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:19:54AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>>
>> IIRC somebody reported similar problem recently. It basically means
>> there's an inconsistent balance state. Adding Ilya to CC.
>
> Leho, so you just mount with discard patch and run 'bt
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:40:08AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:37:08AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > The whole thing is about our overcommit stuff, that is,
> > since we are not able to get _precise_ number of reservation right now, we
> > usually
> > reserve more than what
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 05:20:46PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 16:54 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:53 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a system that's
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
> On 2012-04-10 T 20:48 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> How can I create config for /data or other directories (other than
>> manually creating the config file and .snapshots directory)?
>
> This should do it:
>
> sudo snapper -c home
On 2012-04-10 T 20:48 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Anyway, I got snapper-0.0.10-0 installed now, but having a small
> problem. I use different subvolumes for multiple directories. For
> example, /home and /data. Creating the config for both results in an
> error
>
> $ sudo snapper list-config
Please, don't reply above full quote.
On 10.04.2012 10:34, Jan Killius wrote:
> Any plans to merge/develop further ?
Yes, but not high in priority.
The old patch set was basically working (as far as I remember), but
there's no chance you can just happily apply it to the current btrfs
code withou
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:18:45AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> I noticed that openSUSE buildservice now provides debs for ubuntu as
>> well. I can't seem to find a way to add it to apt source list though,
>> using the usual line
>>
>> d
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:08:15PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> > libblocxx is not required for snapper anymore since about a
> > month. It's checked during configure.
>
> You're right. I just tested it, and not having libblocxx during
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 05:20:46PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 16:54 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:53 -0400, Calvin Walton wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a system that's
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
>> https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
>> snapper, it's a tool for managing btr
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
> https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
> snapper, it's a tool for managing btrfs snapshots
> (http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It de
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:18:45AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> > We have now created a project in the openSUSE buildservice were
> > we provide snapper packages for various distributions, e.g. RHEL6
> > and Fedora 16. Please find the down
Current version of snapper (commit 50dec40) bails out with this error
if .snapshots directory doesn't exist (as is the case on new snapper
install):
2012-04-10 16:15:30,241 ERROR libsnapper(17784)
Snapshot.cc(nextNumber):362 - mkdir failed errno:2 (No such file or
directory)
This patch tries to c
Hi,
I've created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
snapper, it's a tool for managing btrfs snapshots
(http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx
available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archi
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:19:54AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:32:00AM +0300, Leho Kraav wrote:
> > It is also BUG time WITH the patch. Mount succeeds, but "btrfs fi balance
> > HOME" gives us:
> >
> > Apr 10 00:24:18 server sudo: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened
Any plans to merge/develop further ?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:06:28PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > I just wanted to ask if storing metadata on a dedicated device is
>> > implemented at the moment ?
>> > It's listed under "Project ideas" and th
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:16:05AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Nobody yet, I'm going to send a patch shortly that will support this.
> > Thanks,
>
> Great. It would also be far preferable if it was just always on (at
> least by default) rather than requiring a mount option.
[looks into J
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:06:28PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > I just wanted to ask if storing metadata on a dedicated device is
> > implemented at the moment ?
> > It's listed under "Project ideas" and there is supposed to be a patch
> > but I can't find it anywhere.
>
> AFAIK, not yet, but it is on
On 04/10/2012 02:57 PM, Jan Killius wrote:
> Hello,
> I just wanted to ask if storing metadata on a dedicated device is
> implemented at the moment ?
> It's listed under "Project ideas" and there is supposed to be a patch
> but I can't find it anywhere.
AFAIK, not yet, but it is on plan :)
--
li
29 matches
Mail list logo
