Locking and unlocking delayed ref mutex are in the different functions,
and the name of lock functions is not uniform, so the readability is not
so good, this patch optimizes the lock logic and makes it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 8
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:20:20PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2012/12/17 06:23 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:51:33PM +0100, Sebastien Luttringer wrote:
Hello,
snip
I get the feeling that RAID1 only
Hi, everyone.
As we know, there is no backup function for qgroup. when the problem
occurs, the users must recover qgroup configuration manually, it is not
convenient. And besides that, some users might want to import an existed
qgroup configuration into a new filesystem. Btrfs does not have such
On 19.12.2012 12:25, Miao Xie wrote:
Hi, everyone.
As we know, there is no backup function for qgroup. when the problem
occurs, the users must recover qgroup configuration manually, it is not
convenient. And besides that, some users might want to import an existed
qgroup configuration into
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:57:23PM +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:
I am pretty weak with Mediawiki. Is there any way somebody could
please place my name 'Atri Sharma' for the Btree locking contention in
the wiki?
Done. We're using templates for the project descriptions, and clicking
'edit' leads to
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:06:07AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
+static int btrfs_ioctl_set_fslabel(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
+{
+ struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(fdentry(file)-d_inode)-root;
+ struct btrfs_super_block *super_block = root-fs_info-super_copy;
+ struct
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:34:08PM +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:
Sorry for bothering again, but I cant see Btree Lock contention marked
as in progress or my name anywhere on
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas
Could you please check?
I don't know what happened to the edit, but
Hi all,
Did someone have met this problem before. When doing the tests, I hit
the WARN_ON. Is this log make sense or someone had fixed the problem.
If needed, I can supply the detail log and the testcase source file.
Version: the latest codes at linus git tree.
[ 2140.981293]
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Rock Lee zim...@code-trick.com wrote:
Hi all,
Did someone have met this problem before. When doing the tests, I hit
the WARN_ON. Is this log make sense or someone had fixed the problem.
If needed, I can supply the detail log and the testcase source
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:12:01AM -0700, Rock Lee wrote:
Hi all,
Did someone have met this problem before. When doing the tests, I hit
the WARN_ON. Is this log make sense or someone had fixed the problem.
If needed, I can supply the detail log and the testcase source file.
Hi,
I just try to write the testcase a few hours before. So there will be
some problems.
Maybe you can ignore the unimplemented and the ugly parts.
Welcome any feedback. :)
I have uploaded the test source file to Github. Please open this link:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:16:03PM +0100, Koen De Wit wrote:
When trying to create a clone (reflink) of a file on a different device,
you'll get this error:
Invalid cross-device link
However, an empty file is created on the target location. An invalid clone
operation should not result
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
if (!caching_ctl) {
BUG_ON(!block_group_cache_done(block_group));
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(block_group, start, num_bytes);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ // 6185
The actual
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Alexander Block abloc...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some research on deduplication in the past and there are some
problems that you will face. I'll try to list some of them (for sure
not all).
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Martin Křížek martin.kri...@gmail.com
[ sorry, resend. My lbdb autocompleted with an extra r in kernel.org ]
Hi everyone,
My for-linus branch has a big set of fixes and features:
Does this include raid-[56]?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
r...@karlsbakk.net
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:09:57PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
[ sorry, resend. My lbdb autocompleted with an extra r in kernel.org ]
Hi everyone,
My for-linus branch has a big set of fixes and features:
Does this include raid-[56]?
As Chris's last sentence in that mail
On wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:02:59 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:58:33PM -0700, Miao Xie wrote:
On tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:51:57 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
We're deleting the stupid thing, no sense in updating the inode for the new
size. We're running into having 50-100
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:40:25 +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
On 19.12.2012 12:25, Miao Xie wrote:
Hi, everyone.
As we know, there is no backup function for qgroup. when the problem
occurs, the users must recover qgroup configuration manually, it is not
convenient. And besides that, some users
I'm getting some kernel warnings from a btrfs raid1 filesystem that's
serving up nfs4 to a couple of other computers on a small home network.
I ran 3.6.x for several weeks before upgrading and didn't see any warnings
like this.
[ 1712.223791] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:3716
19 matches
Mail list logo
