On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:06:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
Hmm, I guess it's cool to get the allocation-specific decoding which you
don't get from the generic kernel leak tracking?
I mean that by doing this in btrfs, instead of doing it generically in
the allocator, you get specific
Thanks for libbtrfs. comments below.
On 01/09/2013 05:41 AM, Mark Fasheh wrote:
send-test.c links against libbtrfs and uses the send functionality provided
to decode and print a send stream to the console. We use the
BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA flag as actual file data is never needed for
Mark,
test case :
make (Do not run make all)
make install
generates the following error..
install -m755 -d /usr/local/lib
install libbtrfs.so.1.0 libbtrfs.so.1 libbtrfs.so /usr/local/lib
install: cannot stat `libbtrfs.so.1.0': No such file or directory
install: cannot stat `libbtrfs.so.1':
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:46:03AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:25:41PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:11:32PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:54:26PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:05:39AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:07:34PM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
This is for detecting extent map leak.
Hmm,
Hello,
I have one thing I think I don't really understand about btrfs,
Normally if I use ext4 I make a 3 partitions for my distro.
one for boot about 1G
one for home about 30G
one for root for the rest of my 100G.
Now I wonder if I want to do the same with btrfs.
Can I do the same so make 3
On Thu 10-01-13 13:47:57, Miao Xie wrote:
writeback_inodes_sb(_nr)_if_idle() is re-implemented by replacing down_read()
with down_read_trylock() because
- If -s_umount is write locked, then the sb is not idle. That is
writeback_inodes_sb(_nr)_if_idle() needn't wait for the lock.
-
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Chris Carlin chrisrcar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a week-old filesystem that is reported clean by btrfsck and
scrub, but that fails under operations ranging from du to sync and
umount (but no failures if mounted readonly).
My problem sounds similar to a few
But after flipping slab code, I find that another callback will disable
merging slabs when allocating a slab, so I'm not sure if it worth doing so...
Do you mean the find_mergeable() stuff in SLUB?
What do you think about it?
I don't know, pass in a callback to destruction?
void
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Chris Carlin chrisrcar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response, Hugo!
This hard drive is not production, so I can afford to tinker with it
if it helps you guys track down anything interesting. Of course, I'd
prefer to restore it rather than wipe it…
What
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
Hello,
I have one thing I think I don't really understand about btrfs,
Normally if I use ext4 I make a 3 partitions for my distro.
one for boot about 1G
one for home about 30G
one for root for the rest of my 100G.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:34:25PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Roelof Wobben r.wob...@home.nl wrote:
I have one thing I think I don't really understand about btrfs,
Normally if I use ext4 I make a 3 partitions for my distro.
one for boot about 1G
one
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 05:31:09PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Mark,
test case :
make (Do not run make all)
make install
Thanks for testing!
generates the following error..
install -m755 -d /usr/local/lib
install libbtrfs.so.1.0 libbtrfs.so.1 libbtrfs.so /usr/local/lib
install: cannot
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 05:28:22PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Thanks for libbtrfs. comments below.
No problem, thanks for looking over and testing this out. I'll correct the
whitespace error below for my next send of the patches.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi,
I'm running OpenSUSE12.2 on VMware ESXi5.
I create /local using BTRFS file system with 3 devices (sdc, sdd, sde).
These 3 devices are VMware's virtual disk (vmdk files).
Instead of adding another new virtual disk,
ESXi allows to increase Virtual Disk size,
so I increase the size for 3
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:29:47AM +, Rick Liu wrote:
Hi Rick,
use
btrfs fi resize devid:max
to make btrfs use all space of disk devid
[Rick Liu]
Hi,
I tried, but it seems no effect.
(dev/sdc was 300GB and now is 500GB, )
After resize,
/dev/sdc1 is still 300GB.
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
total bytes scrubbed: 25.42GB with 2 errors
error details: super=2
The superblock errors are detected but not corrected right away, because
next transaction commit will overvrite it.
Does scub report the errors
You'll need to use something like fdisk or cfdisk to resize the
partition first. With (c)fdisk, that involves deleting and recreating
the partition with the same starting point. (fdisk gives you more
control here). As with most low-level FS-resizing tools, btrfs fi
resize doesn't attempt
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 02:18:44AM +, Rick Liu wrote:
You'll need to use something like fdisk or cfdisk to resize the
partition first. With (c)fdisk, that involves deleting and recreating
the partition with the same starting point. (fdisk gives you more
control here). As with
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:12:11PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Thu 10-01-13 13:47:57, Miao Xie wrote:
writeback_inodes_sb(_nr)_if_idle() is re-implemented by replacing
down_read()
with down_read_trylock() because
- If -s_umount is write locked, then the sb is not idle. That is
truncate() vs. ftruncate() differ in the VFS; truncate()
doesn't set (ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME), and it's up to the
fs to do the timestamp updates if the size changes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
---
Hm, am I breaking the rules by updating the vfs inode fields
before the
Very low priority.
No user data at risk.
8GB virtual disk being installed to, and the installer is puking. I'm trying to
figure out why.
I first get an rsync error 12, followed by the installer crashing. What's
interesting is this, deleting irrelevant source file systems, just showing the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Very low priority.
No user data at risk.
8GB virtual disk being installed to, and the installer is puking. I'm trying
to figure out why.
I first get an rsync error 12, followed by the installer crashing. What's
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:04 PM, cwillu cwi...@cwillu.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
Very low priority.
No user data at risk.
8GB virtual disk being installed to, and the installer is puking. I'm trying
to figure out why.
I first
[root@localhost tmp]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda33746816 3193172 1564 100% /mnt/sysimage
/dev/sda1 495844 31509438735 7%
/mnt/sysimage/boot
/dev/sda33746816
25 matches
Mail list logo
