Due to some historical reasons, we remove 'printing leaf' part, which'd
lead to 'Segmentation fault' of btrfs-debug-tree -e, this patch adds it
back.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
debug-tree.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
I believe what I am going to write is a bug report.
When I finaly did
# btrfs send -v /mnt/adama-docs/backups/20130101-192722 | btrfs receive
/mnt/tmp/backups
to migrate btrfs from one partition layout to another.
After a while system keeps saying that Too many open files in system
and
(Sorry for the late reply, I was on my vacation of the Spring Festival last
week.)
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:56:32 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:35:37PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
or something like that. Me and kdave reproduced by running 274 in a loop, it
happpened
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:44:06AM +0530, Hemanth Kumar wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Here's a question -- what are you testing? (Not just here, but in
general, with your test infrastructure)
There are (at least) three classes of tests
On wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:13:22 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a
deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the
transaction while a commit was already happening. The new committer would
try and flush ordered
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:56:19 +0100 (CET), Fredrik Tolf wrote:
The oops cut can be found here:
http://www.dolda2000.com/~fredrik/tmp/btrfs-oops
This scrub issue is fixed since Linux 3.8-rc1 with commit
4ded4f6 Btrfs: fix BUG() in scrub when first superblock reading gives EIO
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:22:09AM -0700, Miao Xie wrote:
On wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:13:22 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a
deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the
transaction while a commit was
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:47:45 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
What about this patch(UNTESTED)?
thanks,
liubo
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index ca7ace7..dac9d4b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4142,9 +4142,14 @@ static void inode_tree_del(struct inode
On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Bob McGowan ramjr0...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though things look OK from the command line, logging in through the
window system fails (actually, just hangs).
I assume this means I should be doing something to clean up the
subvolume? Or maybe there's
On 02/18/13 18:14, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
I experience a kernel panic with General protection fault when doing
a scrub on Kernel 3.8-rc7.
Here is a screenshot: http://tinypic.com/r/34r6nad/6
I'd love to see the first stacktrace...
The weird part is that the scrub completes from initramfs,
Here you go, I also added 2 other screenshots of the same problem.
http://tinypic.com/r/5ckgug/6
http://tinypic.com/r/t0i9t4/6
http://tinypic.com/r/2r3xdvl/6
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Arne Jansen li...@die-jansens.de wrote:
On 02/18/13 18:14, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
I experience a kernel
On 02/18/13 18:53, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
Here you go, I also added 2 other screenshots of the same problem.
http://tinypic.com/r/5ckgug/6
http://tinypic.com/r/t0i9t4/6
http://tinypic.com/r/2r3xdvl/6
do you have any idea how I can reproduce it here?
-Arne
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:37 PM,
This patch adds some helpers to manage the strings allocation and
deallocation.
The function string_list_add(char *) adds the passed string to a list;
the function string_list_free() frees all the strings together.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
Makefile |3
Enhance the command btrfs filesystem df to show space usage information
for a mount point(s). It shows also an estimation of the space available,
on the basis of the current one used.
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
Makefile |2 +-
cmds-fi-disk_usage.c |
This patch adds some functions to manage the printing of the data in
tabular format.
The function
struct string_table *table_create(int columns, int rows)
creates an (empty) table.
The functions
char *table_printf(struct string_table *tab, int column,
int row,
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
man/btrfs.8.in | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/btrfs.8.in b/man/btrfs.8.in
index e2f86ea..50dc510 100644
--- a/man/btrfs.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfs.8.in
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ btrfs \- control a btrfs
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
cmds-device.c|3 ++
cmds-fi-disk_usage.c | 141 ++
cmds-fi-disk_usage.h |4 ++
3 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
cmds-fi-disk_usage.c | 434 +-
cmds-fi-disk_usage.h |2 +
cmds-filesystem.c|2 +
utils.c | 58 +++
utils.h |3 +
5 files changed, 498
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
man/btrfs.8.in |8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/btrfs.8.in b/man/btrfs.8.in
index 50dc510..e60c81f 100644
--- a/man/btrfs.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfs.8.in
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ btrfs \- control a btrfs filesystem
Hi all,
I updates my previous patches [1] to add support for raid5/6.
These patches update the btrfs fi df command and add two new commands:
- btrfs filesystem disk-usage path
- btrfs device disk-usage path
The command btrfs filesystem df now shows only the disk usage/available.
$ sudo btrfs
Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it
---
man/btrfs.8.in | 49 +
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/man/btrfs.8.in b/man/btrfs.8.in
index 94f4ffe..e2f86ea 100644
--- a/man/btrfs.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfs.8.in
@@ -31,6 +31,8
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:04:26PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This patch adds some helpers to manage the strings allocation and
deallocation.
The function string_list_add(char *) adds the passed string to a list;
the function string_list_free() frees all the strings together.
Please
Chris and team, hats off on the RAID5/6 being at least experimental. I have
been following your work for a year now, and waiting for these days.
I am trying to get my head rapped around the architecture for BTRFS before I
jump in and start recommending code changes to the branch.
What I am
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 04:20:58PM -0700, Tony Plack wrote:
Chris and team, hats off on the RAID5/6 being at least experimental.
I have been following your work for a year now, and waiting for these
days.
I am trying to get my head rapped around the architecture for BTRFS
before I jump in
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:53:50PM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:47:45 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
What about this patch(UNTESTED)?
thanks,
liubo
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index ca7ace7..dac9d4b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++
On 02/19/2013 12:08 AM, Zach Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:04:26PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
This patch adds some helpers to manage the strings allocation and
deallocation.
The function string_list_add(char *) adds the passed string to a list;
the function string_list_free()
26 matches
Mail list logo
