On Aug 24, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Joel Johnson wrote:
>
> Similar to what Duncan described in his response, on a hot-remove (without
> doing the proper btrfs device delete), there is no opportunity for a
> rebalance or metadata change on the pulled drives, so I would expect there to
> be a signat
On 2013-08-24 14:30, Sandy McArthur wrote:
I was surprised to find
that I'm not allowed to remove one of the two drives in a RAID1. Kernel
message is "btrfs: unable to go below two devices on raid1" Not
allowing it
by default makes some sense, however a --force flag or something would
be
benef
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Joel Johnson wrote:
> On 2013-08-24 11:24, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Should I file a few bugs to capture the related issues? Here are the
>> discrete issues that seem to be present from a user point of view:
>
>
> After writing this, I figured I'd experiment with t
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index c90be01..742dea1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3460,6 +3460,7 @@ static inline void free_fs_info(struct btrfs_
On 2013-08-24 11:24, Joel Johnson wrote:
Should I file a few bugs to capture the related issues? Here are the
discrete issues that seem to be present from a user point of view:
After writing this, I figured I'd experiment with the current state and
try to properly delete and add the sdd device
On Aug 23, 2013, Chris Murphy wrote:
When replacing a failed disk, I'd like btrfs to compare states between
the
available drives and know that it needs to catch up the newly added
device,
but this doesn't yet happen. It's necessary to call btrfs balance.
I can only test device replacement, n
On Aug 24, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> I recommend autodefrag for general use, as well, but you'll want to have
> it enabled when you first start copying data to the filesystem, and some
> distros don't enable it by default and setup a system on btrfs, which
> mean
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can I do the following in a shell script:
>
> - check whether my file system supports cp --reflink?
touch foo; if cp --reflink=always foo bar; then ...; fi; rm -f foo bar
> - check whether two files share the same data o
Hi,
how can I do the following in a shell script:
- check whether my file system supports cp --reflink?
- check whether two files share the same data on disk, i.e. one has been
created by cp --reflink of the other?
Thank you!
Thomas Koch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
Martin Steigerwald posted on Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:58:07 +0200 as excerpted:
> Am Freitag, 23. August 2013, 12:29:42 schrieb Xavier Bassery:
>> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:38:56 +0200
>>
>> David Kofler wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > can someone tell me which mount options are included in "defaults"
>> > mount o
Chris Murphy posted on Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:58:14 -0600 as excerpted:
> So it says it's degraded but it really isn't?
> I'm not sure what's up here.
In general, this was my experience a couple months ago when I tried it
then, as well.
And yes, IIRC the wiki actually describes the "degraded" moun
11 matches
Mail list logo
