Dearest,
Kind regards, I am Miss ZILDA THOMAS ,tall,slim,fair,and a very good
looking girl that loves travelling and dancing, a student,that loves to be
loved,kindly permit my contacting you through this medium I am compelled
to contact you via this medium for obvious reasons which you will
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
What's the kernel and btrfs progs version?
I wish the dmesg errors were more explicit about the nature of checksum
errors: do the two metadata checksums mismatch each other (one of them
matches with data), or the metadata
Michael Göhler posted on Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:45:32 +0100 as excerpted:
The use case for that is to set quotas for the child subvolumes.
Quite apart from the main thread subject, you're aware that there are
major bugs with btrfs quotas/qgroups ATM, right? I'd certainly be wary
of depending on
Hendrik Friedel posted on Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:16:34 +0100 as excerpted:
can someone please help me on this?
Your replies are upside down (reply before the quoted context in which it
should be taken, edited to replied context as appropriate), so I've not
included further quoted context.
To
Hello,
I did run the Samba testsuite and have a failing test
(samba.vfstest.stream_depot). It revealed that it only fails on btrfs. The
reason is that a simple check fails:
if (smb_fname_base-st.st_ex_nlink == 2)
If you create a directory on btrfs and check stat:
$ mkdir x
$ stat x
File:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Andreas Schneider a...@cryptomilk.org wrote:
Hello,
I did run the Samba testsuite and have a failing test
(samba.vfstest.stream_depot). It revealed that it only fails on btrfs. The
reason is that a simple check fails:
if (smb_fname_base-st.st_ex_nlink == 2)
On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Michael Göhler vi...@myjm.de wrote:
The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount handler.
I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be used behind the scenes
for the described
Hi Chris
thanks for taking the time.
The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount
handler.
I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to be used behind the scenes
for the described purpose. Consider the
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com wrote:
Btrfs has always had these filler extent data items for holes in inodes. This
has made somethings very easy, like logging hole punches and sending hole
punches. However for large holey files these extent data items are
On Friday 08 November 2013 06:24:01 cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Andreas Schneider a...@cryptomilk.org
wrote:
Hello,
I did run the Samba testsuite and have a failing test
(samba.vfstest.stream_depot). It revealed that it only fails on btrfs. The
reason is that a
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
What's the kernel and btrfs progs version?
I wish the dmesg errors were more explicit about the nature of checksum
errors: do the two metadata checksums mismatch
On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it
kreij...@libero.it wrote:
Instead of using set-default, I am used to rename the subvolume.
I.E. I assume that the root filesystem is a subvolume always called
__active.
When I want to rollback, I rename __active in
On 2013-11-08 18:44, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it
kreij...@libero.it wrote:
Instead of using set-default, I am used to rename the subvolume.
I.E. I assume that the root filesystem is a subvolume always called
__active. When I
Hello,
I recently noticed that my boot has become slower - it took around 29s, while
at the beginning it was ~6s. I thought it was an issue with systemd, because it
failed to properly indicate at which stage the slowdown occurred and how long
it took. I rolled back to a pretty fresh root
Silly me; I am using a fully updated Arch Linux x64 (3.11.6 kernel), I have a
single HDD with a root and home subvolume under the main btrfs subvolume and I
am not using any exotic settings. This is a most regular desktop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:10:00PM +0100, y...@wp.pl wrote:
Silly me; I am using a fully updated Arch Linux x64 (3.11.6 kernel), I have a
single HDD with a root and home subvolume under the main btrfs subvolume and
I am not using any exotic settings. This is a most regular desktop.
Can
On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Michael Göhler vi...@myjm.de wrote:
Hi Chris
thanks for taking the time.
The boot subvolume is then set with 'btrfs subvolume set-default' and
mounted without subvol/subvolid option by Arch's default mount handler.
I'm unconvinced it's a good idea for it to
Sure;
the kernel line from grub.cfg:
linux /boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=c26e6d9a-0bbb-436a-a217-95c738b5b9c6
rootflags=noatime,space_cache rw quiet
proc/mounts:
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
sys /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
dev
On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it wrote:
Now I don't know what snapshot that is, since it's just renamed to
some non-descriptive name like root which happens to, by
convention, always be the active root. This is the problem with using
user domain to store
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:37:37PM +0100, y...@wp.pl wrote:
Sure;
the kernel line from grub.cfg:
linux /boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=c26e6d9a-0bbb-436a-a217-95c738b5b9c6
rootflags=noatime,space_cache rw quiet
OK, this may be your problem. You're generating the space cache
every time
I will try doing that and report back if the boot time deteriorates again. I
thought that was the default mount option - it definitely is on Arch, because
this was the original mount option in fstab. My boot lags have begun when I was
still mounting (probably remounting) root using fstab,
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:37:37PM +0100, y...@wp.pl wrote:
Sure;
the kernel line from grub.cfg:
linux /boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=c26e6d9a-0bbb-436a-a217-95c738b5b9c6
rootflags=noatime,space_cache rw quiet
OK,
On Friday, November 08, 2013 07:35:18 PM y...@wp.pl wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed that my boot has become slower - it took around 29s,
while at the beginning it was ~6s. I thought it was an issue with systemd,
because it failed to properly indicate at which stage the slowdown occurred
On Friday, November 08, 2013 07:35:18 PM y...@wp.pl wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed that my boot has become slower - it took around 29s,
while at the beginning it was ~6s. I thought it was an issue with systemd,
because it failed to properly indicate at which stage the slowdown occurred
Hi everyone,
This patch is now the tip of the master branch for btrfs-progs, which
has been updated to include most of the backlogged progs patches.
Please take a look and give it a shake. This was based on Dave's
integration tree (many thanks Dave!) minus the patches for online dedup.
I've
I create a new btrfs filesystem and then add a new device and delete
the original device. When I run 'btrfs filesystem show', the total
device is two and there is an error that some devices are missing.
I also tried to resize the filesystem but didn't work. Resizing
without device id have an
On 08/11/13 22:01, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi everyone,
This patch is now the tip of the master branch for btrfs-progs, which
has been updated to include most of the backlogged progs patches.
Please take a look and give it a shake. This was based on Dave's
integration tree (many thanks Dave!)
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:25:24 PM Liu Bo wrote:
Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash:
It's worth noting that Greg K-H has said he'll take stable patches before they
hit mainline whilst Linus is off-net, as reported here at the kernel summit:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:37:32 PM Duncan wrote:
Note that there's another critical patch in-flight, patching a bug
triggered by btrfs balance on filesystems with pre-allocated files (like
systemd does with its journal and various torrent clients do with their
downloads). But this one is
Hi, Frank, thanks for your help again.
Continuing my saga with filesystem recovering.
btrfsck $DEVICE
fails and says some files are corrupted. That is because of my recent
disk crash. I found all these files and indeed - reading it produces
an error. I removed those files and ran btrfsck again.
30 matches
Mail list logo
