Hi folks,
The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has
just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your
outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in
this update, please resubmit them to x...@oss.sgi.com so they can be
picked up in the
On Sun, 11 May 2014 16:11:56 Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2014/05/11 11:52 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
Below is the output of running a balance a few times on a 120G SSD.
Sorry forgot to mention that's kernel 3.14.1 Debian package.
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoull() to replace simple_strtoull(),
because simple_strtoull() is marked for obsoletion.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen zhenzhang.zh...@huawei.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Btrfs device id start from 1, not 0.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 560c557..d480353 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ int get_fs_info(char
Seeding device support allows us to create a new filesystem
based on existed filesystem.
However newly created filesystem's @total_devices should include seed
devices. This patch fix the following problem:
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
# btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb
# mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# btrfs
Hi Anand,
On 05/12/2014 10:00 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
This patch posted a long time back should fix it.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/33276
I sent a patch to address another problem, plus your patch should can
fix the problem.
Hello Anand,
I agree we can export @total_devices to fix 'btrfs file show' problem.
This patch addressed two problem, it is better to split it into two patches.
Could you please resend the patch, at least we should fix 'btrfs file show'
problem firstly.
Thanks,
Wang
On 03/07/2014 11:48 PM,
On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:05:05 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Btrfs device id start from 1, not 0.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 560c557..d480353 100644
---
On 05/13/2014 06:48 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:05:05 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Btrfs device id start from 1, not 0.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:18:04PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
To be clear, I would like to avoid inode_cache on 64bit machine.
In order to avoid the risk to exhaust the inode on 32bit and to be
backward compatible with what already exists, we could add a flag to
mkfs.btrfs to be only
Russell Coker posted on Tue, 13 May 2014 17:57:00 +1000 as excerpted:
The pathological case is where you have a chunk that is 1% full and
*every* other in-use chunk on the device is 100% full. In that
situation, a balance will simply move that data into a new chunk (which
will only ever reach
When running send, if an inode only has extended reference items
associated to it and no regular references, send.c:get_first_ref()
was incorrectly assuming the reference it found was of type
BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY due to use of the wrong key variable.
This caused weird behaviour when using the found
Regression for btrfs send when an inode only has extended references
associated to it (no regular references present). This used to cause
incorrect access to a b+tree leaf, where an extended reference item
was accessed as if it were a regular reference item, causing unexpected
and unpredictable
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 04:57:18PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 03:42:49PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I tried with 3.14.3 and it went further, however it died with
legolas:/mnt/btrfs_pool2# btrfs send
Allow the specification of the filesystem UUID at mkfs time.
(Implemented only for mkfs.btrfs, not btrfs-convert).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com
---
diff --git a/btrfs-convert.c b/btrfs-convert.c
index a8b2c51..d62d4f8 100644
--- a/btrfs-convert.c
+++ b/btrfs-convert.c
@@
Hi!
I'm trying to do a send/receive of a snapshot between two disks on
Fedora 20 with Linux 3.15-rc5 (and also tried with 3.14 and 3.11) and
SELinux disabled, and then I'm receiving the following error:
[root@darwin /]# btrfs subvolume snapshot -r / @.$(date
+%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S)Create a
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:44:44PM -0300, Bernardo Donadio wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to do a send/receive of a snapshot between two disks on
Fedora 20 with Linux 3.15-rc5 (and also tried with 3.14 and 3.11) and
SELinux disabled, and then I'm receiving the following error:
[root@darwin /]# btrfs
Btrfs device id start from 1, not 0.
That was an intentional change.
50275ba btrfs-progs: there is devid 0 when replace is running
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/utils.c
18 matches
Mail list logo
