is cryptographically secure integrity checking possible with btrfs?

Hey. For encryption we have dm-crypt and in principle I'm happy with having that at the block device level below the filesystem - perhaps except for any possible performance issues, especially when used with software RAID (regardless of whether MD or btrfs')[0]. But obviously integrity

Re: btrfs: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:676!

On 10/14/2014 02:31 AM, Chris Mason wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com wrote: Ping? This BUG_ON()ing due to GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure is really silly :( Agreed, I have a patch for this in testing. It didn't make my first pull but I'll get it

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:47:03AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: Hi, everyone, This patch series fixes a few bugs that occur under low memory conditions. These were exposed by a change in behavior of GFP_NOFS allocations in 3.19-rc7, by commit 9879de7373fc (mm: page_alloc: embed OOM killing

Re: is cryptographically secure integrity checking possible with btrfs?

Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:35:19AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Hey. For encryption we have dm-crypt and in principle I'm happy with having that at the block device level below the filesystem - perhaps except for any possible performance issues, especially when used with