Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 00:18:53 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 08:59:59 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2015, 16:35:39 CET schrieben Sie:
> > > Am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2015, 12:10:37 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> > > > Am
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:15:59PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I have always interpreted it as simply "no user changes to the filesystem,"
> and that is clearly what the vfs does with the flag...
Yep,
> Given that nothing in the documentation implies that the block device itself
> must remain
I have updated the btrfs tools.
The error with find roots was fixed.
I think i’m making some progress…
sudo ./btrfs restore -v -o -t 25606820544512 --path-regex
^/\(\|deer\(\|/masurca\(\|/quorum_mer_db.jf\)\)\)$ /dev/sdd1 ~/recover/
parent transid verify failed on 25606820544512 wanted 21614
Hello,
checking all my btr file systems after seeing a lot of trouble on a
particular installation, I came across this:
# btrfs scrub start -B -c3 /mnt/schroot/
ERROR: scrubbing /mnt/schroot/ failed for device id 1: ret=-1, errno=28 (No
space left on device)
scrub canceled for
On 12/17/15 8:01 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 09:29 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Given that nothing in the documentation implies that the block
>>> device itself
>>> must remain unchanged on a read-only mount, I don't see any problem
>>> which
>>> needs fixing.
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 09:29 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Given that nothing in the documentation implies that the block
> > device itself
> > must remain unchanged on a read-only mount, I don't see any problem
> > which
> > needs fixing. MS_RDONLY rejects user IO; that's all.
>
> And thanks for the
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 03:25 +, Duncan wrote:
> So it's definitely _not_ something that reiserfsck would do in a
> "normal"
> fsck, only when doing "I'm desperate and don't have backups, go to
> the
> ends of the earth if necessary to recover what you can of my data,
> and
> yes, I
[I'm combining the messages again, since I feel a bit bad, when I write
so many mails to the list ;) ]
But from my side, feel free to split up as much as you want (perhaps
not single characters or so ;) )
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 04:06 +, Duncan wrote:
> Just to mention here, that I said
Eric Sandeen wrote on 2015/12/16 21:15 -0600:
On 12/16/15 7:41 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi,
In a recent btrfs patch, it is going to add a mount option to disable
log replay for btrfs, just like "norecovery" for ext4/xfs.
But in the discussion on the mount option name and use case, it seems
On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 20:51 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > -r, --read-only
> > Mount the filesystem read-only. A synonym is -o ro.
> >
> > Note that, depending on the filesystem type, state and
> > kernel behavior, the system may still write to the
> > device. For
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
