Re: "not a btrfs filesystem"

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> You have to point balance to the mount point of the banana, not to the >> block device. (balance does its work while the file system is

Re: "not a btrfs filesystem"

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:52:19PM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: > You have to point balance to the mount point of the banana, not to the > block device. (balance does its work while the file system is mounted) Idiot me. I always forget that. Greetings Marc --

Re: dup vs raid1 in single disk

Thanks Austin and Roman for the interesting discussion. Alex. On 19/01/17 21:02, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2017-01-19 13:23, Roman Mamedov wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:39:37 +0100 "Alejandro R. Mosteo" wrote: I was wondering, from a point of view of data safety,

Re: "not a btrfs filesystem"

Hi, On 01/21/2017 03:16 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > I have a file system that I can show, check, but not rebalance: > > 1 [4/3420]mh@fan:~ $ sudo btrfs fi show /dev/mapper/banana-root > Label: none uuid: b2906231-70a9-46d9-9830-38a13cb73171 > Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.82GiB >

"not a btrfs filesystem"

I have a file system that I can show, check, but not rebalance: 1 [4/3420]mh@fan:~ $ sudo btrfs fi show /dev/mapper/banana-root Label: none uuid: b2906231-70a9-46d9-9830-38a13cb73171 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 1.82GiB devid1 size 6.00GiB used 3.69GiB path