On 02/05/2017 12:56 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 12:37:18AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since I'd like to have my python btrfs library work correctly for users
>> with other systems than amd64, I have been looking at IOCTL number
>> generation a bit.
>>
>> I
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 12:37:18AM +0100, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since I'd like to have my python btrfs library work correctly for users
> with other systems than amd64, I have been looking at IOCTL number
> generation a bit.
>
> I just made something up in a branch, which follows
Hi,
since I'd like to have my python btrfs library work correctly for users
with other systems than amd64, I have been looking at IOCTL number
generation a bit.
I just made something up in a branch, which follows the same way in
which the IOC defines in kernel source are done:
Am Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:50:03 +
schrieb "Jorg Bornschein" :
> February 4, 2017 1:07 AM, "Goldwyn Rodrigues"
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, please check if disabling quotas makes a difference in
> > execution time of btrfs balance.
>
> Just FYI: With quotas disabled
February 4, 2017 1:07 AM, "Goldwyn Rodrigues" wrote:
> Yes, please check if disabling quotas makes a difference in execution
> time of btrfs balance.
Just FYI: With quotas disabled it took ~20h to finish the balance instead of
the projected >30 days. Therefore, in my case,
(But it could be changed after subpagesize block patchset, and there is
more work rather than just adding a end_page_writeback, e.g. writepage
endio also needs to be updated).
Ok... the discussion become complicated.
So, let me make this clear.
you think
a) this is a bug;
we need to clear
Lakshmipathi.G posted on Sat, 04 Feb 2017 08:25:04 +0530 as excerpted:
>>Should quota support generally be disabled during balances?
>
> If this true and quota impacts balance throughput, at-least there should
> an alert message like "Running Balance with quota will affect
> performance" or
Juergen 'Louis' Fluk posted on Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:16:51 +0100 as
excerpted:
> The server is running kernel 3.19.0-79-generic (ubuntu 14.04),
> btrfs-tools 3.12-1ubuntu0.1.
> Does it make sense to use newer kernel and/or tools to recover?
I'm not a dev, just a list regular and btrfs user, but I