(Conversation order changed to put program output at bottom)
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 6:10 PM, james harvey
> wrote:
>> Does this mean that although I've never had a corrupted disk bit
>>
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 6:10 PM, james harvey wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Martin Steigerwald
> wrote:
>> Hey James.
>>
>> james harvey - 12.05.18, 07:08:
>>> 100% reproducible, booting from disk, or even Arch installation ISO.
>>>
Thanks you two very much for your answers.
So if I sum up correctly, I could:
1- use Self-Encrypting Drive (SED), since my drive is a Samsung NVMe 960
EVO, which is supposed to support SED according to
http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/support/faqs-nvmessd:
"*Do Samsung NVMe
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Hey James.
>
> james harvey - 12.05.18, 07:08:
>> 100% reproducible, booting from disk, or even Arch installation ISO.
>> Kernel 4.16.7. btrfs-progs v4.16.
>>
>> Reading one of two journalctl files causes a kernel
Adam Bahe wrote:
Hello all,
'All' includes me as well, but keep in mind I am not a BTRFS dev.
I have a drive that has been in my btrfs array for about 6 months now.
It was purchased new. Its an IBM-ESXS SAS drive rebranded from an HGST
HUH721010AL4200. Here is the following stats, it passed
Hello all,
I have a drive that has been in my btrfs array for about 6 months now.
It was purchased new. Its an IBM-ESXS SAS drive rebranded from an HGST
HUH721010AL4200. Here is the following stats, it passed a long
smartctl test. But I'm not sure what to make of it.
[/dev/sdi].write_io_errs
Hey James.
james harvey - 12.05.18, 07:08:
> 100% reproducible, booting from disk, or even Arch installation ISO.
> Kernel 4.16.7. btrfs-progs v4.16.
>
> Reading one of two journalctl files causes a kernel oops. Initially
> ran into it from "journalctl --list-boots", but cat'ing the file does