On 11/3/18 5:20 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 3.11.18 г. 3:34 ч., Su Yue wrote:
On 2018/11/2 10:10 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hey Su.
Sorry for the late reply cause I'm busy at other things.
Anything further I need to do in this matter or can I consider it
"solved" and you
Adam Borowski posted on Sun, 04 Nov 2018 20:55:30 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 06:29:06PM +, Duncan wrote:
>> So do consider adding noatime to your mount options if you haven't done
>> so already. AFAIK, the only /semi-common/ app that actually uses
>> atimes these days is
On 2018/11/5 上午1:00, Sebastian Ochmann wrote:
> Thank you very much for the quick reply.
>
> On 04.11.18 14:37, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018/11/4 下午9:15, Sebastian Ochmann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive which
>>> stopped working
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 06:29:06PM +, Duncan wrote:
> So do consider adding noatime to your mount options if you haven't done
> so already. AFAIK, the only /semi-common/ app that actually uses atimes
> these days is mutt (for read-message tracking), and then not for mbox, so
> you should
On 04.11.18 19:31, Duncan wrote:
[This mail was also posted to gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs.]
Sebastian Ochmann posted on Sun, 04 Nov 2018 14:15:55 +0100 as
excerpted:
Hello,
I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive
which stopped working correctly.
Kernel
Sebastian Ochmann posted on Sun, 04 Nov 2018 14:15:55 +0100 as excerpted:
> Hello,
>
> I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive which
> stopped working correctly.
> Kernel 4.18.16 (Arch Linux)
I see upgrading to 4.19 seems to have solved your problem, but this is
Thank you very much for the quick reply.
On 04.11.18 14:37, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018/11/4 下午9:15, Sebastian Ochmann wrote:
Hello,
I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive which
stopped working correctly. The drive is used as a backup drive with zstd
compression to
Sterling Windmill wrote:
Out of curiosity, what led to you choosing RAID1 for data but RAID10
for metadata?
I've flip flipped between these two modes myself after finding out
that BTRFS RAID10 doesn't work how I would've expected.
Wondering what made you choose your configuration.
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:29:35PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> This series fixes a couple of generic swapfile tests and adds some
> Btrfs-specific swapfile tests. Btrfs swapfile support is scheduled for
> 4.21 [1].
>
> 1:
Out of curiosity, what led to you choosing RAID1 for data but RAID10
for metadata?
I've flip flipped between these two modes myself after finding out
that BTRFS RAID10 doesn't work how I would've expected.
Wondering what made you choose your configuration.
Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:55
Duncan wrote:
waxhead posted on Fri, 02 Nov 2018 20:54:40 +0100 as excerpted:
Note that I tend to interpret the btrfs de st / output as if the error
was NOT fixed even if (seems clearly that) it was, so I think the output
is a bit misleading... just saying...
See the btrfs-device manpage,
On 2018/11/4 下午9:15, Sebastian Ochmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive which
> stopped working correctly. The drive is used as a backup drive with zstd
> compression to which I regularly rsync and make daily snapshots. After I
> routinely
Hello,
I have a btrfs filesystem on a single encrypted (LUKS) 10 TB drive which
stopped working correctly. The drive is used as a backup drive with zstd
compression to which I regularly rsync and make daily snapshots. After I
routinely removed a bunch of snapshots (about 20), I noticed later
13 matches
Mail list logo