th SAMBA, deleted them on the
BTRFS volume and put them back in again. After setting the permissions
the same as they were before and restarting boxbackup the problem vanished.
- --
A. James Lewis (ja...@fsck.co.uk)
Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but people
built perfectl
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:29 +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 07:46 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:53:37 +0200 Nico Schottelius
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Good morning devs,
> >>
> >> I'm wondering whether the raid- and volume-management-builtin of btrfs is
> >> actually a sane
see how it can even tell I've added more storage, let
alone fail to boot.
--
A. James Lewis (ja...@fsck.co.uk)
"Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but people built
perfectly good brick walls long before they knew why cement works."
--
To unsubscribe from
I've been running BTRFS for a while testing out various stuff, and I've
found it to be quite stable (although reading this list makes me realize
how much activity there really is).. I just hit my first bump in the
road, and I wondered if someone could give me a hint how I can gather
enough informat
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 23:58 +0100, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently envision a backup setup for my laptop which has a SSD. I
> would like to use an external HDD und span a raid1 over these two
> devices and also creating snapshots. What I would like to prevent, is
> that these snapsh
I'm far from an expert here, but perhaps you would be worth trying a
newer version of the BTRFS drivers, either via a newer kernel or
re-compiling a kernel with updated BTRFS patches.
I would think that the simplest "quick test" to see if this would help
you would be to get a snapshot from Ubuntu
had become inaccessible, I might be tempted to put the
drive on a shelf for 6 months and see if btrfsck was able to repair
filesystems by then. It may be that the on disk format is changed
before that happens, but I understand that this is now relatively
unlikely.
A. James Lewis
--
To unsubs
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:44:11PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> > Here is the latest set of performance runs from the 2.6.35-rc5 tree.
> > Included is a refresh of all the other filesystems with some changes
> > for barriers on and off since this has been somewhat of a hot topic
> > recently.
>
>
> From: Oystein Viggen tihlde.org>
> Subject: Re: Configuring default mount options..
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs
> Date: 2010-07-26 06:08:54 GMT (5 hours and 4 minutes ago)
>
> * ["A. James Lewis"]
>
> > Maybe there is a wa
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 03:10 +0200, Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen wrote:
> On 26 July 2010 02:56, A. James Lewis wrote:
> > If using BTRFS on a removable drive... it may be a problem for example,
> > to always mount with compression, or always mount with encryption (I
drive, or flash stick, the filesystem can be configured
to mount with compression by default.
Maybe there is a way to do this already, but it seems like the
filesystem itself should contain preferences for the way it is used
under those circumstances.
A. James Lewis
--
To unsubscribe from this
11 matches
Mail list logo
