[PATCH] btrfs: tests: Fix a memory leak in error handling path in 'run_test()'
If 'btrfs_alloc_path()' fails, we must free the resourses already allocated, as done in the other error handling paths in this function. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> --- fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c index 1458bb0ea124..8444a018cca2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c @@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test_func, int bitmaps, u32 sectorsize, path = btrfs_alloc_path(); if (!path) { test_msg("Couldn't allocate path\n"); - return -ENOMEM; + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; } ret = add_block_group_free_space(, root->fs_info, cache); -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH V2] btrfs: Remove some dead code
'btrfs_iget()' can not return NULL, so this test can be removed. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> --- V1 --> v2: fix the patch description --- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c index e4b48f377d3a..afd8b0c10acd 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ static struct inode *__lookup_free_space_inode(struct btrfs_root *root, btrfs_release_path(path); inode = btrfs_iget(root->fs_info->sb, , root, NULL); - if (!inode) - return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); if (IS_ERR(inode)) return inode; if (is_bad_inode(inode)) { -- 2.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove some dead code
Le 03/11/2016 à 13:43, Tobias Klauser a écrit : On 2016-11-01 at 11:26:06 +0100, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: 'btrfs_iget()' can not return an error pointer, so this test can be removed. This descrption does not match what the patch actually does. Shouldn't it say "...can not return NULL, so this test can be removed."? You are obviously correct. Cut'n'Paste error while sending other patches. I will send a V2 with an updated description. Thanks for the review. CJ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH] btrfs: Remove some dead code
'btrfs_iget()' can not return an error pointer, so this test can be removed. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> --- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c index e4b48f377d3a..afd8b0c10acd 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ static struct inode *__lookup_free_space_inode(struct btrfs_root *root, btrfs_release_path(path); inode = btrfs_iget(root->fs_info->sb, , root, NULL); - if (!inode) - return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); if (IS_ERR(inode)) return inode; if (is_bad_inode(inode)) { -- 2.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html