Just wanted to say thank you Hugo for doing this. The latest patch set may of
not
fixed my problem, but it is still nice to be able to see the progress being
made
to btrfs-progs in one area.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message t
Thanks for the reply, Copied the patch from the "diff" line onwards and patched
against a fresh kernel 2.6.39-r1 and r2 tree with same result:
localhost linux # patch --dry-run --verbose -p1 < disk-io.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
-
Thanks for the reply. copied the patch from the line "diff" onward
did a fresh kernel tree and got the following (same on 2.6.39-r1 and r2)
localhost linux# patch -p1 --dry-run --verbose < disk-io.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
Earlier I tried the read only patch with no result. Josef said I must be
applying it wrong because the error I get is not possible with the patch
applied.
I tried again with no luck and posted my steps for review. Well here I am a few
days later with the following questions:
1) If my steps are
well here is what I,m doing:
patch -p1 < disk-io.patch
output: "patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c"
rmmod btrfs
rmmod lzo_compress
make -j3
make -j3 modules
make -j3 modules_install
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/linux-next
depmod -a
(reboot)
modprobe btrfs
btrfs device scan
btrfs filesystem
Well still no cigar, didnt even change the error output. Thank you though for
at least trying to help. here goes the error info with your patch applied to
/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:
mount -o ro /dev/sdf1 (same for c1,d1,etc) /btrfs (dmesg output)
[ 1647.330104] btrfs: open_ctree failed
[ 1683.328038] d
I'm game for trying it, been waiting a good bit to recover, and i have spare
drives to save the data to. Just post the git link for it if it's different then
Chris Masons git tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vge
Well, I'm patient. Rather have a fsck that works than a fsck that may thrash the
FS so no 'gun to the head' on this one. Some feedback on RECENT progress would
be nice. Besides your merge branch Hugo (yes I tried it still no cigar...) it's
been ghost since December 2010.
--
To unsubscribe from thi
Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the
fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave
them be until the tool is done. I don't know when it will be done as I am not a
developer, mearly a follower.
--
To unsubscribe from this
Same here, got 5TB in "suspense", running btfs-progs-unstable, also tried the
new hugo patches. Kernel 2.6.39-r1 gentoo box
error from mount /dev/sdf1 /server, or btrfsck -s 0,1,2,etc /dev/sdd1:
parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 1545
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctre
10 matches
Mail list logo