Re: btrfs-progs: integration branch updated

2011-07-01 Thread Daniel Witzel
Just wanted to say thank you Hugo for doing this. The latest patch set may of 
not
 fixed my problem, but it is still nice to be able to see the progress being 
made
to btrfs-progs in one area.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Witzel
Thanks for the reply. copied the patch from the line diff onward 
did a fresh kernel tree and got the following (same on 2.6.39-r1 and r2)

localhost linux# patch -p1 --dry-run --verbose  disk-io.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|index c650a1d..53e330e 100644
|--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
--
Patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 281.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 328.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 338.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 360.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2012.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 2631.
done


A perfect patch job if I say so :)

any other ideas are welcome 

Dan Witzel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Witzel
Thanks for the reply, Copied the patch from the diff line onwards and patched
against a  fresh kernel 2.6.39-r1 and r2 tree with same result:

localhost linux # patch --dry-run --verbose -p1  disk-io.patch 
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|index c650a1d..53e330e 100644
|--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
--
Patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 281.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 328.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 338.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 360.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2012.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 2631.
done


same problem. Any other ideas would be great

Dan Witzel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-24 Thread Daniel Witzel
well here is what I,m doing:

patch -p1  disk-io.patch  
output: patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
rmmod btrfs 
rmmod lzo_compress
make -j3
make -j3 modules
make -j3 modules_install
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/linux-next
depmod -a

(reboot)
modprobe btrfs
btrfs device scan
btrfs filesystem show (all drives show)
mount -o ro /dev/sdb1 /btrfs

and the output is : 

[ 4364.813453] parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 
1545
[ 4364.817093] btrfs: open_ctree failed
 

I checked the resulting disk-io.c file and the changes were merged. as you can
see I rebuilt my kernel and modules, rebooted and still got this error. is there
a step I'm missing? 

thanks




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Witzel
I'm game for trying it, been waiting a good bit to recover, and i have spare
drives to save the data to. Just post the git link for it if it's different then
Chris Masons git tree.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Witzel
Well still no cigar, didnt even change the error output. Thank you though for 
at least trying to help. here goes the error info with your patch applied to
/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:

mount -o ro /dev/sdf1 (same for c1,d1,etc) /btrfs (dmesg output)
[ 1647.330104] btrfs: open_ctree failed
[ 1683.328038] device label 1TB0 devid 1 transid 2135 /dev/sdf1
[ 1683.344059] parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 
1545
[ 1683.349109] btrfs: open_ctree failed

btrfsck -s 0 (and 1) /dev/sdf1(c1,d1,etc):
localhost btrfs-progs-unstable # ./btrfsck -s 1 /dev/sdc1
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
failed to read /dev/sr0
failed to read /dev/sr0
parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 1545
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed.
Aborted

(dmesg output)
[ 1825.231434] device label 1TB0 devid 1 transid 2135 /dev/sdf1
[ 1825.235292] device label 1TB0 devid 2 transid 2134 /dev/sde1
[ 1825.238560] device label 1TB0 devid 3 transid 2135 /dev/sdd1
[ 1825.241176] device label 1TB0 devid 4 transid 2135 /dev/sdc1
[ 1825.244681] device label 1TB0 devid 5 transid 2135 /dev/sdb1


gentoo baselayout 2, kernel 2.6.39-r1, btrfs-progs-unstable:cmason git master
branch, 5 disk usb raid-0 array



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

2011-06-22 Thread Daniel Witzel
Well, I'm patient. Rather have a fsck that works than a fsck that may thrash the
FS so no 'gun to the head' on this one. Some feedback on RECENT progress would
be nice. Besides your merge branch Hugo (yes I tried it still no cigar...) it's
been ghost since December 2010.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [HELP!] parent transid verify failed on 600755752960 wanted 757102 found 756726

2011-06-21 Thread Daniel Witzel
Welcome to the club, I have a similar issue. We pretty much have to wait for the
fsck tool to finish being developed. If possible unhook the drives and leave
them be until the tool is done. I don't know when it will be done as I am not a
developer, mearly a follower.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: New btrfsck status

2011-06-13 Thread Daniel Witzel
Same here, got 5TB in suspense, running btfs-progs-unstable, also tried the
new hugo patches. Kernel 2.6.39-r1 gentoo box

error from mount /dev/sdf1 /server, or btrfsck -s 0,1,2,etc /dev/sdd1:

parent transid verify failed on 2206281838592 wanted 2135 found 1545
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root-node)' failed.
Aborted


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html