On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 03:21:09PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:56:32PM +0800, Guangliang Zhao wrote:
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could
been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not
built, so the mount options
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could
been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not
built, so the mount options will appear to be supported but will
be silently ignored.
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao lucienc...@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: David Sterba
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could
been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not
built, so the mount options will appear to be supported but will
be silently ignored.
Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao lucienc...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/super.c
