On 08/30/12 13:55, Jie Liu wrote:
On 08/30/12 13:44, Anand Jain wrote:
Jeff,
I don't find the get label ioctl part unless I am missing something.
Any idea?
Sorry, I took for granted that this patch has already been merged last
year. :(
To honor your efforts, I'd like to re-send a revised
On 08/30/12 14:28, Anand Jain wrote:
The original patch could be revised with this support easily.
How about using one structure and one ioctl number for both of them?
i.e,
#define BTRFS_IOC_FSLABEL_CTL_IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 50, struct
btrfs_ioctl_fslabel_ctl_args)
#define
Hi Anand,
I have posted a patch for set label back to last year, which can be
found at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1124642/
Besides that, we have discussed to use 50 as the ioctl(2) number at
that time.
task assignment in our wiki page:
, Anand Jain wrote:
Ah. I missed that. Thanks.
So should use your original patch.
-Anand
On 29/08/12 17:00, Jie Liu wrote:
Hi Anand,
I have posted a patch for set label back to last year, which can be
found at:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1124642/
Besides that, we have discussed
On 08/25/12 14:23, Alexander Block wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Liu jeff@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for taking a look.
On 08/24/2012 09:09 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
how do you see this snapshot-diff functionality vs the send/receive
functionality that was
On 08/16/12 16:03, Arne Jansen wrote:
On 16.08.2012 09:57, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
For malloc may fail, we should check it before assign
values to the fields of struct btrfs_trans_handle *h.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui shh...@gmail.com
---
transaction.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5
