> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Steffen Sindzinski
> wrote:
>
>> [57830.611730] BTRFS warning (device sdc2): checksum/header error at logical
>> 17478699876352 on dev /dev/sdd2, sector 338986176: metadata leaf (level 0)
>> in tree 318
>> [57830.611732] BTRFS warning
I guess not using RAID-0 would be a good start…
Vennlig hilsen
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
Hið góða skaltu í stein höggva, hið illa í snjó rita.
- Original Message -
> F
but I've worked with ZFS a while, and haven't seen those issues there.
Vennlig hilsen
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
Hið góða skaltu í stein höggva, hið illa í snjó rita.
--
To unsubscribe fro
data on the fast storage).
And btw, how far is raid[56] and block-level dedup from something useful in
production?
Vennlig hilsen
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
Hið góða skaltu í stein
…
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et elementært imperativ for alle
[ sorry, resend. My lbdb autocompleted with an extra r in kernel.org ]
Hi everyone,
My for-linus branch has a big set of fixes and features:
Does this include raid-[56]?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
r...@karlsbakk.net
http
Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller
hi
It's been some two years since I read about the becoming of raid5 etc in btrfs.
Since the code is available in linux, why isn't this already in btrfs? Is
Oracle holding back?
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http
,
but still I can't see anything in the open.
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å
- Original Message -
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing,
as in terms of usability
reason for btrfs to exist is to bring
something new into the Linux world, and if those features aren't stable, then
btrfs isn't. It's as simple as that. Would you buy a Subaru (or something) 4wd
with a 2wd working?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r
/ - that'll mirror the block device(s) on
which btrfs resides.
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et elementært imperativ for alle
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller
of a
primary key (an integer in the range of 0 to 1,000,000) and a random
number of arbitrary data bytes (length in the range from 10 to 1000
byte).
snip/
Can you share the code for this benchmark, please?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http
Hi all
It's about a year now since I saw the first posts about RAID[56] in Btrfs. Has
this gotten any further?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
Hi all
Is raid[56] coming to btrfs? There was some talk about it a year back or so,
but I haven't seen anything yet
Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
- David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org skrev:
I've been looking again at the RAID5/RAID6 support, and updated the
tree
at git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git#merged
At the moment, we limit writes to a single disk's worth at a time,
which
means we _always_ do the
takes up a very high amount of I/O, significantly reducing
disk performance for the zpool (at least this is the case for 2009.06 and
Solaris 10). Will there be done efforts to help avoding this with Btrfs?
Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http
into lib/.
Seems something is in the works.
By the way - how does FUSE ZFS work? Is it stable? Good performance?
We're using ZFS natively on Solaris 10 now, perhaps moving the storage
to opensolaris soon.
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-
btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er
Hi
Is snapshot removal possible yet? Also, is there any grub support yet?
I'd be nice to be able to boot off a btrfs mirror
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
intelligibelt
in their opensolaris-based
storage solution
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815121009
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
intelligibelt. Det er et elementært
On 11. juli. 2009, at 16.59, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:58 +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I know it's not in yet, but is there a plan to implement raid-z(2)-
like operation? I have heard of plans to integrate with the existing
md-subsystem in the kernel, but I'm
Hi
I know it's not in yet, but is there a plan to implement raid-z(2)-
like operation? I have heard of plans to integrate with the existing
md-subsystem in the kernel, but I'm not sure if this will be
appropriate comparing this to how things are done in zfs/raid-z.
roy
--
Roy Sigurd
On 18. juni. 2009, at 15.56, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
I have heard/read about systems from Sun and NetApp using SDs for
caching. Sun uses different SDs for read and write caching (one
being faster for reads and the other for writes). The storage
solution from Sun is based
On 18. juni. 2009, at 17.55, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I have heard/read about systems from Sun and NetApp using SDs for
caching. Sun uses different SDs for read and write caching (one being
faster for reads and the other
newformat
fatal: Not a git repository
Have this code been removed, or is it me doing something funny?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ
27 matches
Mail list logo