On 2 September 2010 14:07, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On 02/09/10 16:50, Miao Xie wrote:
I just change the 2.1 to 2 in your patch, because the
orignal code is LGPL v2.1, LGPL v2.1 permits us to apply
the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead
of it.
Ahhh
On 2 September 2010 15:24, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
On 02/09/10 18:16, chxand...@gmail.com wrote:
Umm, isn't the only one that can do that the copyright holder?
The copyright holder can use whatever license they wish; the LGPL
tells the licensee what rights *they* have, which
