Re: Phoronix article slaming BTRFS

2009-06-23 Thread nightrow
If you look here : http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page in 
the benchmarking section, you will notice that the test was made more 
than one month ago.
I also mentionned, as said by chris on phoronix phorums, that kernel 
starting from 2.6.30 should be faster.


I think we should expect them to run it periodicaly against newer version.

I made the link to the phoronix test. They may not be the best, but this 
is all I found. If you find any better test, don't hesitate to add them.


disclaimer: I'm not a btrfs developer, just a entusiast that follows
the developement.

Jb benoit.

Jaime sanchez wrote :

They are using 2.6.29.4 kernel, it isn't a bit old??

I think that kernel doesn't have the last btrfs updates, and that it
is a very bad work and benchmarks results from phoronix part. If u are
benchmarking an experimental filesystem benchmark it with the lastest
updaets ¿? it doesn't have sense.

  




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: BUG: btrfsck segfaults on regular file

2009-04-29 Thread nightrow
I just tried running btrsfck without enough right to open the device, i got the
same : a segfault. I also got the segfault taking a unknow device.

Please display a message like : Unknow device or file, you may not have enough
rights to open it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html