Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output time elapsed for each major tree it checked

2017-09-17 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2017年09月17日 15:08, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: At Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:26:23 +0900, Qu Wenruo wrote: Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs check", which is quite weird. This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for both original mode and

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output time elapsed for each major tree it checked

2017-09-17 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:26:23 +0900, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs > check", which is quite weird. > > This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for > both original mode and lowmem mode, so we can have a clue

Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output time elapsed for each major tree it checked

2017-09-11 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 02:26:23PM +0900, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs > check", which is quite weird. > > This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for > both original mode and lowmem mode, so we can have a clue

[PATCH] btrfs-progs: Output time elapsed for each major tree it checked

2017-09-10 Thread Qu Wenruo
Marc reported that "btrfs check --repair" runs much faster than "btrfs check", which is quite weird. This patch will add time elapsed for each major tree it checked, for both original mode and lowmem mode, so we can have a clue what's going wrong. Reported-by: Marc MERLIN