On 05/10/2013 11:46 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:43:34PM +0200, Marcus Lövgren wrote:
Yes, you were right! Adding another drive to the array made it continue
without errors. Is this already reported as a bug?
I believe it has been, yes. I think we've even had a patch
Hi list,
I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b.
I have a three disk array of level single:
# btrfs fi sh
Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB
devid1 size 2.73TB used 2.25TB path /dev/sdd
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:07:56PM +0200, Marcus Lövgren wrote:
Hi list,
I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b.
I have a three disk array of level single:
# btrfs fi sh
Label: none uuid: 2e905f8f-e525-4114-afa6-cce48f77b629
Total devices 3 FS bytes used
On May 10, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:07:56PM +0200, Marcus Lövgren wrote:
Hi list,
I am using kernel 3.9.0, btrfs-progs 0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b.
I have a three disk array of level single:
# btrfs fi sh
Label: none uuid:
Yes, you were right! Adding another drive to the array made it
continue without errors. Is this already reported as a bug?
Thanks for the help,
Marcus
2013/5/10 Remco Hosman - Yerf IT re...@yerf-it.nl:
On May 10, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:43:34PM +0200, Marcus Lövgren wrote:
Yes, you were right! Adding another drive to the array made it continue
without errors. Is this already reported as a bug?
I believe it has been, yes. I think we've even had a patch out for
it. I haven't looked to see if it's
