Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-07-14 Thread Christian Brunner
2011/7/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box This is

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-07-14 Thread Josef Bacik
On 07/14/2011 03:27 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/7/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-07-14 Thread Josef Bacik
On 07/14/2011 03:27 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/7/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-07-13 Thread Josef Bacik
On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote: 2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box This is because use_block_rsv() is having to do

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-07-12 Thread Christian Brunner
2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com: On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box This is because use_block_rsv() is having to do a reserve_metadata_bytes(), which shouldn't

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-06-07 Thread Josef Bacik
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ] [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-06-07 Thread Josef Bacik
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote: On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ] [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-06-06 Thread Miao Xie
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ] [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware

Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

2011-06-03 Thread Josef Bacik
Hello, I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ] [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules