Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060 during rebalancing

2013-10-07 Thread Jan Krcmar
hi,

i've got the same problem kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060.
this was solved by patching the kernel with following patch
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git/commit/?id=b6c60c8018c4e9beb2f83fc82c09f9d033766571

i've also found, that this patch is NOT included in 3.11.x stable
kernel tree. see here to confim the absence
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/fs/btrfs/relocation.c?id=refs/tags/v3.11.4

fous

2013/10/7 Guenther Starnberger linux-bt...@gst.priv.at:
 On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 07:26:07AM +0200, Guenther Starnberger wrote:

 Yes - this also happens on 3.12-rc kernels. Here's the stacktrace for 4b97280
 (which is several commits ahead of 3.12-rc2):

 As an update to my previous mail: I just tried to continue the balance with an
 updated btrfs-next kernel (4380ae355c5c17c150d29bf0c07f44046102ca2e) but I'm
 still seeing the same issue:

 [  273.810775] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
 [  273.812257] btrfs: has skinny extents
 [  291.906125] BTRFS debug (device dm-0): unlinked 1 orphans
 [  291.979115] btrfs: continuing balance
 [  296.214254] btrfs: relocating block group 1542996361216 flags 1
 [  411.032805] btrfs: found 18 extents
 [  449.598891] [ cut here ]
 [  449.600360] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
 [  449.601603] invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 [  449.601971] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq crc32c libcrc32c 
 zlib_deflate xor xts gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod usb_storage snd_intel8x0 
 snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus psmouse snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer ppdev 
 microcode snd joydev evdev pcspkr serio_raw parport_pc parport i2c_piix4 
 intel_agp intel_gtt mperf i2c_core e1000 soundcore processor battery button 
 ac ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 hid_generic usbhid hid sr_mod cdrom sd_mod 
 ata_generic pata_acpi ohci_pci ata_piix ahci libahci ohci_hcd ehci_pci 
 ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common libata scsi_mod
 [  449.601971] CPU: 0 PID: 390 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 
 3.11.0-1-90707-g4380ae3-dirty #1
 [  449.601971] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS 
 VirtualBox 12/01/2006
 [  449.601971] task: 88007ad45cd0 ti: 8800786e4000 task.ti: 
 8800786e4000
 [  449.601971] RIP: 0010:[a04f5f1a]  [a04f5f1a] 
 build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971] RSP: 0018:8800786e5ab8  EFLAGS: 00010246
 [  449.601971] RAX:  RBX: 88007ad6e800 RCX: 
 8800780c81d0
 [  449.601971] RDX: 8800786e5b30 RSI: 88007ad6e820 RDI: 
 8800780c81c0
 [  449.601971] RBP: 8800786e5ba0 R08: 88007806d000 R09: 
 8800786e5a70
 [  449.601971] R10:  R11:  R12: 
 
 [  449.601971] R13: 88007888a120 R14: 88007806d600 R15: 
 8800780c81d0
 [  449.601971] FS:  () GS:88007fa0() 
 knlGS:
 [  449.601971] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
 [  449.601971] CR2: 7fe6529864f0 CR3: 7bb99000 CR4: 
 06f0
 [  449.601971] Stack:
 [  449.601971]  88007806da80  8800780c8060 
 88007806d000
 [  449.601971]  88007806d000 88007888a120 88007ad6e000 
 88007888a240
 [  449.601971]  88007806d340 88007ad6e920 88007806da80 
 88007ad6e924
 [  449.601971] Call Trace:
 [  449.601971]  [a04f7408] relocate_tree_blocks+0x1d8/0x630 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04f8920] relocate_block_group+0x280/0x690 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04f8ecd] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x19d/0x2e0 
 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04d0ca8] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.28+0x68/0x780 
 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a0489dd8] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x498/0x970 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04c6499] ? release_extent_buffer+0xa9/0xd0 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04cbdff] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xa0 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04d40c3] btrfs_balance+0x913/0xeb0 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04d46d0] balance_kthread+0x70/0x80 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [a04d4660] ? btrfs_balance+0xeb0/0xeb0 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  [81083680] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
 [  449.601971]  [810835c0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
 [  449.601971]  [814ddeac] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [  449.601971]  [810835c0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
 [  449.601971] Code: 4c 89 ef e8 29 f0 f8 ff 48 8b bd 50 ff ff ff e8 1d f0 f8 
 ff 48 83 bd 30 ff ff ff 00 0f 85 0c fd ff ff 31 c0 e9 ae ef ff ff 0f 0b 0f 
 0b 48 8b 85 30 ff ff ff 49 8d 7e 20 48 8b 70 18 48 89 c2 e8
 [  449.601971] RIP  [a04f5f1a] build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 
 [btrfs]
 [  449.601971]  RSP 8800786e5ab8
 [  449.645464] ---[ end trace 0478746bd226d078 ]---

 - Guenther
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060 during rebalancing

2013-10-06 Thread cwillu
Another user has just reported this in irc on 3.11.2

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1055!
invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: ebtable_nat nf_conntrack_netbios_ns
nf_conntrack_broadcast ipt_MASQUERADE ip6table_nat nf_nat_ipv6
ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6
iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat iptable_mangle nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ebtable_filter ebtables bnep
ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp
kvm_intel ath9k_htc joydev ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath kvm
snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 cfg80211 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support
ath3k r8169 btusb snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel mii
snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep serio_raw snd_seq snd_seq_device mxm_wmi
snd_pcm bluetooth mei_me microcode i2c_i801 rfkill shpchp lpc_ich
mfd_core mei wmi mperf snd_page_alloc snd_timer snd soundcore uinput
btrfs libcrc32c xor zlib_deflate raid6_pq dm_crypt hid_logitech_dj
i915 crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit
drm_kms_helper drm i2c_core video
CPU: 1 PID: 564 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 3.11.2-201.fc19.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: ECS Z77H2-AX/Z77H2-AX, BIOS 4.6.5 10/25/2012
task: 8807ee1c1e80 ti: 8807f1cc8000 task.ti: 8807f1cc8000
RIP: 0010:[a01f8007]  [a01f8007]
build_backref_tree+0x1077/0x1130 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:8807f1cc9ab8  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX:  RBX: 8807eef77480 RCX: dead00200200
RDX: 8807f1cc9b28 RSI: 8807f1cc9b28 RDI: 8807ef5896d0
RBP: 8807f1cc9b98 R08: 8807ef5896d0 R09: 0001
R10: a01f5483 R11:  R12: 8807ef5896d0
R13: 8807ef5896c0 R14: 8807f22ee360 R15: 8807f0e62000
FS:  () GS:88081f24() knlGS:
CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
CR2: 7f7d97749a90 CR3: 0007e38ef000 CR4: 001407e0
Stack:
 8807f0e62580 8807eef77a80 8807ef5899e0 8807eef77780
 8807ea5ab000 8807f22ee360 8807eef777c0 8807f22ee000
 8807f0e62120 8807eef77a80 8807f0e62020 
Call Trace:
 [a01f8478] relocate_tree_blocks+0x1d8/0x630 [btrfs]
 [a01f9108] ? add_data_references+0x248/0x280 [btrfs]
 [a01f9d10] relocate_block_group+0x280/0x690 [btrfs]
 [a01fa2bf] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x19f/0x2e0 [btrfs]
 [a01d1bff] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.32+0x6f/0x740 [btrfs]
 [a0188a79] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x39/0x80 [btrfs]
 [a018d892] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x382/0x940 [btrfs]
 [a01ce15f] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xa0 [btrfs]
 [a01d67e7] btrfs_balance+0x8e7/0xe80 [btrfs]
 [a01d6df0] balance_kthread+0x70/0x80 [btrfs]
 [a01d6d80] ? btrfs_balance+0xe80/0xe80 [btrfs]
 [81088640] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
 [81088580] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
 [8165686c] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [81088580] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
Code: 4c 89 f7 e8 0c 0c f9 ff 48 8b bd 58 ff ff ff e8 00 0c f9 ff 48
83 bd 38 ff ff ff 00 0f 85 1e fe ff ff 31 c0 e9 5d f0 ff ff 0f 0b 0f
0b 48 8b 73 18 48 89 c7 e8 49 f3 01 00 48 8b 85 38 ff ff ff
RIP  [a01f8007] build_backref_tree+0x1077/0x1130 [btrfs]
 RSP 8807f1cc9ab8

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Guenther Starnberger
linux-bt...@gst.priv.at wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:46:41PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:

 3.12-rc really? I'd like to see the stacktrace then.

 Yes - this also happens on 3.12-rc kernels. Here's the stacktrace for 4b97280
 (which is several commits ahead of 3.12-rc2):

 [  126.735598] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
 [  126.737038] btrfs: has skinny extents
 [  144.769929] BTRFS debug (device dm-0): unlinked 1 orphans
 [  144.836240] btrfs: continuing balance
 [  153.441134] btrfs: relocating block group 1542996361216 flags 1
 [  295.780293] btrfs: found 18 extents
 [  310.107200] [ cut here ]
 [  310.108496] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
 [  310.109709] invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 [  310.110268] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq crc32c libcrc32c xor xts 
 gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod usb_storage psmouse ppdev e1000 evdev pcspkr 
 serio_raw joydev microcode snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec i2c_piix4 i2c_core 
 ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer parport_pc parport snd soundcore 
 intel_agp button battery processor ac intel_gtt ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 
 hid_generic usbhid hid sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic pata_acpi ohci_pci 
 ata_piix ahci libahci ohci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common libata 
 scsi_mod
 [  310.110268] CPU: 0 PID: 366 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 
 3.12.0-1-00083-g4b97280-dirty #1
 [  310.110268] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS 
 VirtualBox 12/01/2006
 [  310.110268] task: 880078b0 ti: 880078afe000 task.ti: 
 880078afe000
 [  310.110268] RIP: 0010:[a04f6e8a]  [a04f6e8a] 
 build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060 during rebalancing

2013-09-25 Thread Guenther Starnberger
On one of my btrfs filesystems I'm encountering a reproducable kernel bug
during rebalancing. This issue originally appeared on Linux 3.11.1, but I am
also able to reproduce it in a VM using btrfs-next (c024ca6) and Linux
3.12-rc2 (4a10c2a).

I did the following operations (in chronological order) on the filesystem
before this issue appeared, so they might be responsible for putting the
filesystem into a bad state. However, according to fsck the filesystem looks
fine.

- Regular deduplications with bedup.

- Mounting the previously uncompressed filesystem with the lzo compression
  option and then using defrag to defrag (and compress) each file.

- Running out of diskspace during a bedup run with size cutoff 0, although the
  actual disk usage should be less than 50%. Based on the suggestions in the
  FAQ (http://goo.gl/qCgZR) I decided to try rebalancing the filesystem.

- Rebalance the filesystem (btrfs fi balance /mountpoint -dusage=5) which lead
  to the kernel bug. Subsequent rebalancing runs after reboots and with
  different kernel versions exhibit the same problem.

Log output:

4,694,2141772062,-;[ cut here ]
2,695,2141773153,-;kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
4,696,2141774227,-;invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP 
4,697,2141775124,-;Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq crc32c libcrc32c 
zlib_deflate xor xts gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod usb_storage snd_intel8x0 
snd_ac97_codec pcspkr psmouse i2c_piix4 i2c_core ppdev ac97_bus e1000 snd_pcm 
snd_page_alloc microcode snd_timer intel_agp joydev evdev parport_pc snd 
serio_raw intel_gtt ac parport soundcore battery button mperf processor ext4 
crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic pata_acpi hid_generic usbhid 
hid ata_piix ahci libahci ohci_pci ohci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd usbcore 
usb_common libata scsi_mod
4,698,2141775124,-;CPU: 0 PID: 480 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 
3.11.0-1-90676-gc024ca6-dirty #1
4,699,2141775124,-;Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS 
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
4,700,2141775124,-;task: 88007c2d3b10 ti: 880068d44000 task.ti: 
880068d44000
4,701,2141775124,-;RIP: 0010:[a04f5d3a]  [a04f5d3a] 
build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 [btrfs]
4,702,2141775124,-;RSP: 0018:880068d45ab8  EFLAGS: 00010246
4,703,2141775124,-;RAX:  RBX: 88007c2ef800 RCX: 
88004db48dd0
4,704,2141775124,-;RDX: 880068d45b30 RSI: 88007c2ef820 RDI: 
88004db48dc0
4,705,2141775124,-;RBP: 880068d45ba0 R08: 88004dae7a80 R09: 
880068d45a70
4,706,2141775124,-;R10:  R11:  R12: 

4,707,2141775124,-;R13: 8800787e3900 R14: 88004dae7200 R15: 
88004db48dd0
4,708,2141775124,-;FS:  () GS:88007fa0() 
knlGS:
4,709,2141775124,-;CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
4,710,2141775124,-;CR2: 7ffa7bbd9408 CR3: 764a4000 CR4: 
06f0
4,711,2141775124,-;Stack:
4,712,2141775124,-; 88004dae7480  88004db48560 
88004dae7a80
4,713,2141775124,-; 88004dae7a80 8800787e3900 88007c2ee800 
8800787e3120
4,714,2141775124,-; 88004dae76c0 88007c2ef920 88004dae7480 
88007c2ef924
4,715,2141775124,-;Call Trace:
4,716,2141775124,-; [a04f7228] relocate_tree_blocks+0x1d8/0x630 
[btrfs]
4,717,2141775124,-; [a04f8730] relocate_block_group+0x280/0x690 
[btrfs]
4,718,2141775124,-; [a04f8cdd] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x19d/0x2e0 
[btrfs]
4,719,2141775124,-; [a04d0938] 
btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x68/0x780 [btrfs]
4,720,2141775124,-; [a0489d88] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x498/0x970 [btrfs]
4,721,2141775124,-; [a04c5fb9] ? release_extent_buffer+0xa9/0xd0 
[btrfs]
4,722,2141775124,-; [a04cbbcf] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xa0 [btrfs]
4,723,2141775124,-; [a04d3ee3] btrfs_balance+0x913/0xeb0 [btrfs]
4,724,2141775124,-; [a04d44f0] balance_kthread+0x70/0x80 [btrfs]
4,725,2141775124,-; [a04d4480] ? btrfs_balance+0xeb0/0xeb0 [btrfs]
4,726,2141775124,-; [81083680] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
4,727,2141775124,-; [810835c0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
4,728,2141775124,-; [814ddf2c] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
4,729,2141775124,-; [810835c0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
4,730,2141775124,-;Code: 4c 89 ef e8 b9 f1 f8 ff 48 8b bd 50 ff ff ff e8 ad f1 
f8 ff 48 83 bd 30 ff ff ff 00 0f 85 0c fd ff ff 31 c0 e9 ae ef ff ff 0f 0b 0f 
0b 48 8b 85 30 ff ff ff 49 8d 7e 20 48 8b 70 18 48 89 c2 e8 
1,731,2141775124,-;RIP  [a04f5d3a] build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 
[btrfs]
4,732,2141775124,-; RSP 880068d45ab8
4,733,2141819898,-;---[ end trace fa708b06a85e0e77 ]---

This issue looks very similar to
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839952 but the cause for the issue
in the bug tracker should have been fixed in b6c60c8 which seems to be part of
the btrfs-next tree. I can still 

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060 during rebalancing

2013-09-25 Thread David Sterba
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:56:47AM +0200, Guenther Starnberger wrote:
 On one of my btrfs filesystems I'm encountering a reproducable kernel bug
 during rebalancing. This issue originally appeared on Linux 3.11.1, but I am
 also able to reproduce it in a VM using btrfs-next (c024ca6) and Linux
 3.12-rc2 (4a10c2a).

3.12-rc really? I'd like to see the stacktrace then.

 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
 RIP: 0010:[a04f5d3a]  [a04f5d3a] 
 build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 [btrfs]

This matches the known bug in 3.11, fix was submitted to 3.11.x stable.


thanks,
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060 during rebalancing

2013-09-25 Thread Guenther Starnberger
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:46:41PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:

 3.12-rc really? I'd like to see the stacktrace then.

Yes - this also happens on 3.12-rc kernels. Here's the stacktrace for 4b97280
(which is several commits ahead of 3.12-rc2):

[  126.735598] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
[  126.737038] btrfs: has skinny extents
[  144.769929] BTRFS debug (device dm-0): unlinked 1 orphans
[  144.836240] btrfs: continuing balance
[  153.441134] btrfs: relocating block group 1542996361216 flags 1
[  295.780293] btrfs: found 18 extents
[  310.107200] [ cut here ]
[  310.108496] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
[  310.109709] invalid opcode:  [#1] PREEMPT SMP 
[  310.110268] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq crc32c libcrc32c xor xts 
gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod usb_storage psmouse ppdev e1000 evdev pcspkr serio_raw 
joydev microcode snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec i2c_piix4 i2c_core ac97_bus 
snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_timer parport_pc parport snd soundcore intel_agp 
button battery processor ac intel_gtt ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 hid_generic 
usbhid hid sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic pata_acpi ohci_pci ata_piix ahci 
libahci ohci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common libata scsi_mod
[  310.110268] CPU: 0 PID: 366 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 
3.12.0-1-00083-g4b97280-dirty #1
[  310.110268] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS 
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[  310.110268] task: 880078b0 ti: 880078afe000 task.ti: 
880078afe000
[  310.110268] RIP: 0010:[a04f6e8a]  [a04f6e8a] 
build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 [btrfs]
[  310.110268] RSP: 0018:880078affab8  EFLAGS: 00010246
[  310.110268] RAX:  RBX: 8800784d4000 RCX: 88006a2a9d90
[  310.110268] RDX: 880078affb30 RSI: 8800784d4020 RDI: 88006a2a9d80
[  310.110268] RBP: 880078affba0 R08: 880077d07e00 R09: 880078affa70
[  310.110268] R10:  R11:  R12: 
[  310.110268] R13: 880078c95d80 R14: 880077d07c80 R15: 88006a2a9d90
[  310.110268] FS:  () GS:88007fa0() 
knlGS:
[  310.110268] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[  310.110268] CR2: 7f51ca3af010 CR3: 7bf8d000 CR4: 06f0
[  310.110268] Stack:
[  310.110268]  880077d07d00  88006a2a9320 
880077d07e00
[  310.110268]  880077d07e00 880078c95d80 88007ad99000 
880078c95120
[  310.110268]  880077d07bc0 8800784d4120 880077d07d00 
8800784d4124
[  310.110268] Call Trace:
[  310.110268]  [a04f8378] relocate_tree_blocks+0x1d8/0x630 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04f9880] relocate_block_group+0x280/0x690 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04f9e2d] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x19d/0x2e0 
[btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04d1a88] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.28+0x68/0x780 
[btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a048af08] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x498/0x970 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04c73d9] ? release_extent_buffer+0xa9/0xd0 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04ccd1f] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xa0 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04d5033] btrfs_balance+0x913/0xeb0 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04d5640] balance_kthread+0x70/0x80 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [a04d55d0] ? btrfs_balance+0xeb0/0xeb0 [btrfs]
[  310.110268]  [81083b70] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
[  310.110268]  [81083ab0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
[  310.110268]  [814ef37c] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[  310.110268]  [81083ab0] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x120/0x120
[  310.110268] Code: 4c 89 ef e8 e9 f1 f8 ff 48 8b bd 50 ff ff ff e8 dd f1 f8 
ff 48 83 bd 30 ff ff ff 00 0f 85 0c fd ff ff 31 c0 e9 ae ef ff ff 0f 0b 0f 0b 
48 8b 85 30 ff ff ff 49 8d 7e 20 48 8b 70 18 48 89 c2 e8 
[  310.110268] RIP  [a04f6e8a] build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 
[btrfs]
[  310.110268]  RSP 880078affab8
[  310.160477] ---[ end trace 1caf0f84ada634a2 ]---

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1060!
  RIP: 0010:[a04f5d3a]  [a04f5d3a] 
  build_backref_tree+0x112a/0x11d0 [btrfs]
 
 This matches the known bug in 3.11, fix was submitted to 3.11.x stable.

The kernel under which I've first noticed this issue was 3.11.1. Should this
version already contain the fix?

- Guenther
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html